Attacks/Breaches
1/28/2014
05:58 PM
50%
50%

The IPS Makeover

Next-gen intrusion-prevention systems have fuller visibility into applications and data. But do newer firewalls make IPS redundant?

More organizations are deploying next-generation firewalls that include advanced application inspection and content awareness features, including many of the same features they have been they have been getting from old-school intrusion-prevention systems. That overlap has IT security leaders wondering: Do we still need a traditional, single-task IPS?

IPS vendors are rapidly adding new capabilities to make systems more functional and effective, hoping to resuscitate a category that has long been a staple of the IT security arsenal.

The data suggests that the IPS still has relevance, but its hold is fragile. In the 2013 InformationWeek Strategic Security Survey, only 43% of respondents considered IPS to be "highly effective" at securing their organizations. That response rate is down 3 points from the year before. The firewall fared better: 62% rated their firewalls as highly effective in 2013, though that was down from 66% in 2012. While the two systems stop different types of attacks, it's clear that IT groups view the firewall as more efficient than the IPS.

Read the full article in Dark Reading's January Tech Digest.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
AnonymousMan
100%
0%
AnonymousMan,
User Rank: Moderator
1/29/2014 | 2:06:38 AM
re: The IPS Makeover
Firewalls and IPS each serve a different purpose; comparing their efficiency is just stupid. It's like comparing the efficiency of a toaster and a waffle maker.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-3157
Published: 2015-07-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.

CVE-2015-3443
Published: 2015-07-02
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the basic dashboard in Thycotic Secret Server 8.6.x, 8.7.x, and 8.8.x before 8.8.000005 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a password entry, which is not properly handled when toggling the password mask.

CVE-2015-4228
Published: 2015-07-02
Cisco Digital Content Manager (DCM) 15.0.0 might allow remote ad servers to cause a denial of service (reboot) via malformed ad messages, aka Bug ID CSCur13999.

CVE-2015-4233
Published: 2015-07-02
SQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 8.6(1.2) allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCuu54037.

CVE-2015-4238
Published: 2015-07-02
The SNMP implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 8.4(7) and 8.6(1.2) allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (device reload) by sending many SNMP requests during a time of high network traffic, aka Bug ID CSCul02601.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Marc Spitler, co-author of the Verizon DBIR will share some of the lesser-known but most intriguing tidbits from the massive report