Attacks/Breaches
5/28/2010
02:59 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Tech Insight: The Enterprise Hacks Back!

Have you ever been tempted to strike back against a hacker? Read this before you make the wrong move

Let's face it: We are all tired of attacks against our enterprise networks. Heck, we'd love to stick it to bad guys plaguing our users and our corporate data -- but even though you might have the tools and skills to do it, being a vigilante can be a dangerous game.

Even if you put aside the legal issues -- taking matters into your own hands can constitute a violation of the law -- hacking back could make things worse for your users. If they feel they're in a firefight, then some attackers could choose to take a more persistent approach -- targeted directly at your organization.

As security professionals, we are regularly reminded of our ethical duties to keep data safe, protect our users, and not exploit a vulnerability we did not have specific permission to attack. These things don't apply just to our daily work. Our ethical obligations extend beyond the borders of our network and even to the machines being used in attacks against us.

When's the last time you received a phishing or spear-phishing attack against your organization? Did you stop to look deeper into it, click the link, and start exploring the site that was targeting your users? There are some interesting things that can be found just by viewing the site and attempting to navigate to the root of the attack site's directory.

In some cases, I've seen attackers who were dumb enough to allow directory browsing -- which exposed the entire collection of stolen credentials to anyone who took the file name from the URL. One particular attacker left his exploit kit in the directory -- along with the address he was having the credentials emailed to. Not very smart.

But where does casual browsing of the attacking site begin to go too far?

If the attacker is storing the stolen credentials or credit card numbers alongside his phishing pages, then do not view them. You don't want the FBI knocking on your door asking what you did with the 1,500 credit card numbers you downloaded. And don't go looking for a way to delete the data, either -- you could end up destroying critical evidence that could be used to legally go after the attacker.

For targeted spear-phishing attacks, contact your local FBI office. They may help you to take the site offline and, hopefully, track down the source of the attack. You can also approach your hosting provider to get the site taken offline, which many will do immediately when they realize what's being hosted on their servers. Ideally, the hosting provider will lock the accounts and prohibit access, while preserving the data for investigation by law enforcement.

What about malware and botnets? There has been some interesting research during the past several years into botnet communications and how they can be controlled and even taken over. In 2008, European researchers learned how the Storm botnet communicates and developed an effective attack to disrupt its peer-to-peer (P2P) botnet communications.

If I know how to disrupt a botnet -- making it effectively useless -- should I do it? Not necessarily. In fact, Jose Nazario, a security researcher with Arbor Networks, told Dark Reading, "This has been a taboo subject of exploration, as people do not want to mess with other peoples' PCs by injecting commands."

He's right. Injecting commands into a botnet could have undesired effects -- from the loss of simple connectivity to serious data loss.

However, botnet research like this can be used for good, under the right circumstances. Twice in the past six months (read "Microsoft, Researchers Team Up And Tear Down Major Spamming Botnet" and "Another Botnet Gets Dismantled, But This Time With Arrests)," large botnets have been targeted and taken down as a joint effort by researchers (including those above), private companies (including Microsoft), and law enforcement. By obtaining court orders to monitor the botnet operations and its controllers, researchers were able to gain enough information to help law enforcement arrest three Mariposa botnet hunters.

Next time you consider turning the tables on the attackers, step back and remember you're becoming an attacker yourself -- and could quickly get into hot water, both with your employer and the law.

Instead, take the time to learn how tools like OSSEC HIDS and its active response capabilities can automate blocking attacker IPs without any fuss. Just remember to whitelist your critical servers first.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading, September 16, 2014
Malicious software is morphing to be more targeted, stealthy, and destructive. Are you prepared to stop it?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2006-1318
Published: 2014-09-19
Microsoft Office 2003 SP1 and SP2, Office XP SP3, Office 2000 SP3, Office 2004 for Mac, and Office X for Mac do not properly parse record lengths, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed control in an Office document, aka "Microsoft Office Control Vulnerability."

CVE-2012-2588
Published: 2014-09-19
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in MailEnable Enterprise 6.5 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) From, (2) To, or (3) Subject header or (4) body in an SMTP e-mail message.

CVE-2012-6659
Published: 2014-09-19
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the admin interface in Phorum before 5.2.19 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL.

CVE-2014-1391
Published: 2014-09-19
QT Media Foundation in Apple OS X before 10.9.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted movie file with RLE encoding.

CVE-2014-3614
Published: 2014-09-19
Unspecified vulnerability in PowerDNS Recursor (aka pdns_recursor) 3.6.x before 3.6.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via an unknown sequence of malformed packets.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio