Attacks/Breaches
1/30/2014
03:56 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Point-Of-Sale System Attack Campaign Hits More Than 40 Retailers

Tor-camouflaged 'ChewBacca' payment card-stealing Trojan doesn't appear to be related to Target, RSA researchers say

Another day, another point-of-sale (POS) breach revelation: Dozens of retailers have been infected with a family of malware that stole payment card and personal information from some 50,000 customers.

Researchers with RSA's FirstWatch security team declined to name the victimized retailers, which they have contacted with their findings. Will Gragido, senior manager of RSA FirstWatch, says his team hasn't found any ties between the so-called ChewBacca malware and the attacks on Target, Neiman Marcus, and Michael's.

"There's nothing conclusive to suggest it's tied to Target, Neiman Marcus, or Michael's," Gragido says.

RSA researchers discovered the server infrastructure used in the ChewBacca malware operation, which mainly targeted U.S. retailers, but also retailers in Russia, Canada, and Australia. ChewBacca, a private Trojan that hasn't been spotted for sale in the underground, was first revealed in December by Kaspersky Lab, which pointed out that the cybercriminals using the malware were employing the Tor anonymity network to hide its operations. Kaspersky researcher Marco Preuss explained how the Trojan logs all keystrokes and reads the process memory of the infected machine's running processes, and can exfiltrate specific information.

Today's findings by RSA tie ChewBacca, with its keylogging and memory-scraping features, to a specific POS attack campaign out of the Ukraine against retailers and reveals its Tor-hidden server infrastructure. "In our analysis, when we reverse-engineered the binaries, we were able to see the command-and-control and see that it was Tor-enabled. We identified the drop site" for the stolen data, Gragido says.

The attackers run their command-and-control communications over the Tor network, which masks the real IP address of their servers and encrypts the traffic between the infected machines and the servers. "Being Tor-enabled is not totally unique, but it's still rare," Gragido says. "Leveraging Tor provides a certain amount of anonymity ... that's important for the bad guys to remain under the radar."

That the POS malware was tied to Tor was interesting, too, he says, as a way to keep the operation hidden.

ChewBacca's memory scanner grabs and searches a process' memory, looking for card magnetic-stripe data. When the scanner finds the data, it extracts it and then the server logs it. The attackers have a server-side control panel that lets them review the stolen information, including a "reports" screen that lists information on each infected machine and the data exfiltrated from it, according to RSA.

['Smash-and-grab' attacks targeted point-of-sale systems -- and, in some cases, spread to databases. See Target, Neiman Marcus Data Breaches Tip Of The Iceberg .]

Just how the victims were initially attacked remains a mystery, but what is known is that the Trojan is self-contained and installs a copy of itself in the Windows Start > Startup folder as a Windows print spooler service. "It runs when Windows starts up, and most POS systems are Windows-based systems," Gragido says.

The keylogger then creates a file called "system.log" inside the %temp% folder. RSA says that deleting that file and rebooting the system removes the ChewBacca malware.

"Credit card fraud is not new, but there's been an uptick in activity" against POS systems, Gragido says. "That tells me as a researcher that the field is pretty ripe for picking for vulnerable systems.

One main difference between ChewBacca and the BlackPOS that was reportedly used in the Target attack is that BlackPOS was widely available in the underground. That leaves all sizes of retailers at risk, says Alan Shimel of the CISO Group. "So if you think POS breaches are something that just large retailers need to worry about think again," Shimel said in a blog post. "It was a land grab with everyone trying to get it on as many POS systems as they could. If you think your business would not be a target you are dead wrong. But if you use a POS system you should make sure that you test it for malware. Especially if your POS is Windows based."

ChewBacca was not exactly a complex piece of malware, but it was effective. "The ChewBacca Trojan appears to be a simple piece of malware that, despite its lack of sophistication and defense mechanisms, succeeded in stealing payment card information from several dozen retailers around the world in a little more than two months," says Yotam Gottesman, senior security researcher for RSA FirstWatch, in a blog post today about the research.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Angelshab
50%
50%
Angelshab,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/22/2014 | 7:45:01 AM
re: Point-Of-Sale System Attack Campaign Hits More Than 40 Retailers
Very interesting article about Point-to-Sale system (POS System) in that I have seen plenty of these systems from Mall retailers and still using Lotus Notes.

Relevant URL (s) : http://www.cybernetman.com/en/...
mufidmmn
50%
50%
mufidmmn,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/18/2014 | 7:02:41 PM
re: Point-Of-Sale System Attack Campaign Hits More Than 40 Retailers
halu
larsamund
50%
50%
larsamund,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/13/2014 | 11:29:01 PM
re: Point-Of-Sale System Attack Campaign Hits More Than 40 Retailers
And of all those 40 business that were notified, nobody, customers, employees etc. has come forth with any information? Sounds a bit strange.
larsamund
50%
50%
larsamund,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/13/2014 | 11:26:16 PM
re: Point-Of-Sale System Attack Campaign Hits More Than 40 Retailers
Darn good point.
anon5511426393
50%
50%
anon5511426393,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/13/2014 | 11:00:44 PM
re: Point-Of-Sale System Attack Campaign Hits More Than 40 Retailers
LOL - does anyone else see the word "RSA" in there, and choose not to bother reading past it? Who cares what they "found" - we already know they themselves sell backdoors in their crypto to anyone with a spare $10M to pay. They violated the trust of the entire internet (then lied about it, badly, when we found out) - who could possibly be left that trusts them enough to still read anything they've got to say?
kjhiggins
50%
50%
kjhiggins,
User Rank: Strategist
1/31/2014 | 8:19:06 PM
re: Point-Of-Sale System Attack Campaign Hits More Than 40 Retailers
Correct.
TwistedBitLogic
50%
50%
TwistedBitLogic,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/31/2014 | 6:22:01 PM
re: Point-Of-Sale System Attack Campaign Hits More Than 40 Retailers
I'm assuming how this works is they notify the businesses and each business is responsible for the disclosure of the breach. It's not the researchers breach so they have no right or responsibility to disclose the information.
jwaters974
50%
50%
jwaters974,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/31/2014 | 4:37:13 PM
re: Point-Of-Sale System Attack Campaign Hits More Than 40 Retailers
Isn't it irresponsible to not say who the 40 retailers are? If I get hit, and you knew it would happen - you are an accomplice - if not a co-conspirator looking to have a big breach to enhance the security business. Unjust enrichment of RSA isn't it?
kjhiggins
50%
50%
kjhiggins,
User Rank: Strategist
1/31/2014 | 2:50:22 PM
re: Point-Of-Sale System Attack Campaign Hits More Than 40 Retailers
jwilfong300 RSA FirstWatch is not naming the companies publicly--they have notified them.
jwilfong300
50%
50%
jwilfong300,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/31/2014 | 2:29:05 PM
re: Point-Of-Sale System Attack Campaign Hits More Than 40 Retailers
What are the 40 companies?
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading Tech Digest, Dec. 19, 2014
Software-defined networking can be a net plus for security. The key: Work with the network team to implement gradually, test as you go, and take the opportunity to overhaul your security strategy.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-8142
Published: 2014-12-20
Use-after-free vulnerability in the process_nested_data function in ext/standard/var_unserializer.re in PHP before 5.4.36, 5.5.x before 5.5.20, and 5.6.x before 5.6.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted unserialize call that leverages improper handling of duplicate keys w...

CVE-2013-4440
Published: 2014-12-19
Password Generator (aka Pwgen) before 2.07 generates weak non-tty passwords, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to guess the password via a brute-force attack.

CVE-2013-4442
Published: 2014-12-19
Password Generator (aka Pwgen) before 2.07 uses weak pseudo generated numbers when /dev/urandom is unavailable, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to guess the numbers.

CVE-2013-7401
Published: 2014-12-19
The parse_request function in request.c in c-icap 0.2.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a URI without a " " or "?" character in an ICAP request, as demonstrated by use of the OPTIONS method.

CVE-2014-2026
Published: 2014-12-19
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the search functionality in United Planet Intrexx Professional before 5.2 Online Update 0905 and 6.x before 6.0 Online Update 10 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the request parameter.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join us Wednesday, Dec. 17 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to hear what employers are really looking for in a chief information security officer -- it may not be what you think.