Attacks/Breaches
1/3/2013
05:40 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Phony Google Digital Certificate Blocked By Browser Vendors

Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla are each addressing the problem with security updates to protect users

Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla have decided to revoke trust in two digital certificates improperly issued by a Turkish certificate authority (CA).

The situation came to light Christmas Eve when Google Chrome detected and blocked an unauthorized digital certificate for the "*.google.com" domain.

"We investigated immediately and found the certificate was issued by an intermediate certificate authority (CA) linking back to TURKTRUST, a Turkish certificate authority," blogged Adam Langley, Google Software Engineer. "Intermediate CA certificates carry the full authority of the CA, so anyone who has one can use it to create a certificate for any website they wish to impersonate."

As a result of the detection of the rogue certificate, Google updated Chrome's certificate revocation metadata on Dec. 25 to block the intermediate CA, and then alerted TURKTRUST and other browser vendors.

"TURKTRUST told us that based on our information, they discovered that in August 2011 they had mistakenly issued two intermediate CA certificates to organizations that should have instead received regular SSL certificates," Langley continued. "On December 26, we pushed another Chrome metadata update to block the second mistaken CA certificate and informed the other browser vendors."

According to Microsoft, the intermediate certificate authorities TURKTRUST created were (*.EGO.GOV.TR and e-islam.kktcmerkezbankasi.org). It was the *.EGO.GOV.TR subsidiary CA then used to issue a fraudulent digital certificate to *.google.com, Microsoft notes in a customer advisory.

To address the issue, the company updated the Certificate Trust List (CTL) to remove the trust of the certificates causing the issue.

Mozilla, meanwhile, is "actively revoking trust" for the certificates in an update, blogged Michael Coates, Mozilla's director of security assurance, adding that users can expect a Firefox update Jan. 8.

"This is not a Firefox-specific issue," he explained. "Nevertheless, we are concerned that at least one of the mis-issued intermediate certificates was used for man-in-the-middle (MITM) traffic management of domain names that the customer did not legitimately own or control. We are also concerned that the private keys for these certificates were not kept as secure as would be expected for intermediate certificates."

"We have also suspended inclusion of the “TÜRKTRUST Bilgi İletişim ve Bilişim Güvenliği Hizmetleri A.Ş. (c) Aralık 2007” root certificate, pending further review," he added.

In 2011, CA security received increased attention due to a number of security incidents, including an attack on DigiNotar that led to browser vendors revoking hundreds of fraudulent SSL certificates and ultimately forced the company into bankruptcy.

In light of the most recent situation, Google announced plans to update Chrome again later this month to no longer indicate Extended Validation status for certificates issued by TURKTRUST, though connections to TURKTRUST-validated HTTPS servers may continue to be allowed, Langley blogged.

"Since our priority is the security and privacy of our users, we may also decide to take additional action after further discussion and careful consideration," he added.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-7298
Published: 2014-10-24
adsetgroups in Centrify Server Suite 2008 through 2014.1 and Centrify DirectControl 3.x through 4.2.0 on Linux and UNIX allows local users to read arbitrary files with root privileges by leveraging improperly protected setuid functionality.

CVE-2014-8346
Published: 2014-10-24
The Remote Controls feature on Samsung mobile devices does not validate the source of lock-code data received over a network, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (screen locking with an arbitrary code) by triggering unexpected Find My Mobile network traffic.

CVE-2014-0619
Published: 2014-10-23
Untrusted search path vulnerability in Hamster Free ZIP Archiver 2.0.1.7 allows local users to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse dwmapi.dll that is located in the current working directory.

CVE-2014-2230
Published: 2014-10-23
Open redirect vulnerability in the header function in adclick.php in OpenX 2.8.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in the (1) dest parameter to adclick.php or (2) _maxdest parameter to ck.php.

CVE-2014-7281
Published: 2014-10-23
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shenzhen Tenda Technology Tenda A32 Router with firmware 5.07.53_CN allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that reboot the device via a request to goform/SysToolReboot.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.