Attacks/Breaches

6/5/2015
05:50 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

OPM Breach Shows Government Cybersecurity Remains Work In Progress

Intrusion continues spate of breaches at federal organizations over past few months.

The massive data breach disclosed by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Thursday shows that federal government efforts at shoring up its cybersecurity remain a work in progress.

In a statement Thursday, the OPM said that in April it discovered an intrusion into IT systems that may have compromised personally identifying information on some 4 million current and former federal employees.

The agency is currently working with the FBI and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to understand the full scope of the breach. The investigation is still ongoing and it is possible that additional PII compromises will be discovered, the agency cautioned.

“Since the intrusion, OPM has instituted additional network security precautions, including: restricting remote access for network administrators and restricting network administration functions remotely,” the statement said.

OPM has also instituted a review of all connections to ensure that only legitimate business connections have access to the Internet. In addition, the agency will deploy anti-malware tools across its entire environment to prevent the deployment or execution of malicious software that presumably may have been left behind by the intruders.

The agency will begin sending out letters next week informing victims that personally identifying information of theirs may have been potentially compromised in the incident. It will offer free credit monitoring and identity protection services for 18 months to all victims of the breach.

No details are officially available so far on what systems were breached, how they were broken into, or how the intrusion was discovered.  But several media reports quoted unnamed US officials as pinning the blame on China for the attack. The target of the theft appears to have been Social Security Numbers and other personally identifying information, but it is not clear if the attackers were state sponsored or a criminal group, the New York Times said.

The OPM is fundamentally responsible for human resource functions and personnel policy management for the entire federal government. It stores PII on virtually everyone applying for or holding a federal position or wanting to be considered as a federal contractor. So the breach potentially affects individuals from across the entire federal government, making it the biggest of its kind ever.

The breach marks the second time in the past year that hackers have breached OPM’s network. Last July, DHS officials confirmed to the New York Times that intruders had broken some of OPM's databases before they were detected and blocked. In that incident, the attackers appear to have been targeting data on tens of thousands of federal employees who had applied for top-secret security clearances with the OPM, the Times reported. For the moment at least, it's unclear if last year’s incident and the one reported this week are connected.

The OPM breach continues a spate of recent intrusions into federal networks over the past few months. In the space of just one week last fall, both the White House and the U.S. State Department reported that hackers had broken into their networks and accessed what turned out to be unclassified portions of their respective networks.

Just a few weeks prior to that, the U.S. Postal Service announced a breach affecting about 800,000 employees and 2.9 million customers, while the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced one just a couple of days later.

The incidents show that change is slow with federal cybersecurity, says Chris Wysopal, chief technology officer at application security vendor Veracode.

The company’s data shows that government agencies lag all other sectors in terms of number of serious defects in their application and the rate at which they fix those vulnerabilities. Based on Veracode’s analysis, the government has the highest prevalence of easily exploitable vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting, Wysopal says.

“You would expect the government to protect its personnel data as well as the finance, healthcare, or manufacturing industries but it just isn’t the case,” he said in an emailed statement.

Grayson Milbourne, security intelligence director at Webroot, says that the latest breach shows why government approaches to cybersecurity are in need of reform. “Clearly, the government’s approach to cybersecurity needs to be reformed, prioritized and accelerated,” he said in an emailed statement.

 “That the breach might have been carried out by the Chinese does not absolve the OPM of blame. The issue here is the government’s technological failings and what it should be doing to prevent future attacks,” Milbourne said.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Enrico Fontan
50%
50%
Enrico Fontan,
User Rank: Strategist
6/5/2015 | 3:44:39 PM
EINSTEIN System to tune
Government says the breach has been discovered by EINSTEIN system.

If you look at the EINSTEIN system, it possible to see that it has been developed to detect cyber threats.
Looking at the system last evolution we can see that EINSTEIN 3 system adds an IPS to improve it's capabilities:
"The intrusion prevention capability (IPS) builds upon the previous versions by adding the ability to block and disable attempted intrusions before any harm is done."

I think the IPS feature has to be developed again.


EINSTEIN reference "Cross Agency Priority Goal: Cybersecurity FY2013 Q4 Status Update"
kbannan100
50%
50%
kbannan100,
User Rank: Moderator
6/5/2015 | 11:58:29 AM
Being ahead of a breach
This just shows that even the most sophisticated and (you'd hope) solid security measures don't always work. You constantly have to be ahead of a breach and be looking for the unexpected. 

bit.ly/1P0OVdV

--KB 

Karen J. Bannan, commenting on behalf of IDG and FireEye.
Paladium
100%
0%
Paladium,
User Rank: Moderator
6/5/2015 | 10:23:57 AM
Work in progress....?
No, sadly, the excuse that cybersecurity is a work in progress is unacceptable.  

"Here ya go Sir.  Your car is good as new.  Don't worry about the brakes.  They are not hooked up yet.  Just drive slow.  The tires should be fine too.  No worries.  Just don't make any sharpe turns or they might fall off.  We just couldn't get to putting the nuts on them yet.  A stearing wheel you say?  Here, use this long handled screwdriver to turn the stearing collum."

The single, most important fact everyone should take away from these Government breaches is that politics (petty kingdoms, lack of authority, onerous processes to remove a single screw..., etc.) *prevent* cybersecurity from being properly implemented.  Cold, hard, undisputable fact.  

Ask pretty much every single former (who chose to walk away) federal contractor providing cybersecurity services what the number one reason is.
Government Shutdown Brings Certificate Lapse Woes
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  1/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3906
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 contains hardcoded credentials in the WCF service on port 9003. An authenticated remote attacker can use these credentials to access the badge system database and modify its contents.
CVE-2019-3907
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 stores user credentials and other sensitive information with a known weak encryption method (MD5 hash of a salt and password).
CVE-2019-3908
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 stores backup files as encrypted zip files. The password to the zip is hard-coded and unchangeable. An attacker with access to these backups can decrypt them and obtain sensitive data.
CVE-2019-3909
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 database uses default credentials. Users are unable to change the credentials without vendor intervention.
CVE-2019-3910
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Crestron AM-100 before firmware version 1.6.0.2 contains an authentication bypass in the web interface's return.cgi script. Unauthenticated remote users can use the bypass to access some administrator functionality such as configuring update sources and rebooting the device.