Attacks/Breaches

12/12/2017
11:40 AM
50%
50%

Only 5% of Business Leaders Rethought Security After Equifax

Corporate leaders know little about common security threats like ransomware and phishing, driving their risk for attack.

One-third of business leaders have heard about the WannaCry ransomware attack. Less than 5% say the Equifax breach prompted them to rethink their business' approach to cybersecurity. Both findings, released by Veracode today, indicate a troubling lack of awareness and understanding around major breaches and common security problems.

Researchers polled corporate leaders to gauge their understanding of secure software. One in five said their software budget increased 50% or more over the past three years, but only 50% surveyed understand the risk vulnerable software poses for their business. One-quarter do not understand threats like ransomware, phishing attacks, DDoS attacks, and malicious insiders.

There is a slight shift in awareness, however. Of the 33% who said a cyberattack on another company prompted them to rethink their security strategy, many have taken steps to improve their security posture or plan to do so over the next year. More than one-third have started regularly scanning for vulnerabilities or plan to start in the next twelve months.

Read more details here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
12/12/2017 | 1:39:26 PM
American Management view of IT
Extremely limited, generally as an employee line expense item.  Highly paid American IT workers cost alot of salary and benefit packages.  Besides, nothing EVER breaks (they are doing their jobs so things do NOT BREAK) and therefore Bangalore and H1-B visa types are SO MUCH LESS EXPENSIVE.  After all, all companies exist JUST FOR SHAREHOLDER VALUE and nothing else, right!!!   So much for cyber security - it can be outsourced to a help desk in Bangalore and that is that.  
White House Cybersecurity Strategy at a Crossroads
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/17/2018
Lessons from My Strange Journey into InfoSec
Lysa Myers, Security Researcher, ESET,  7/12/2018
What's Cooking With Caleb Sima
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/12/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-14339
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-19
In Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.1, 2.4.0 to 2.4.7, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.15, the MMSE dissector could go into an infinite loop. This was addressed in epan/proto.c by adding offset and length validation.
CVE-2018-14340
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-19
In Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.1, 2.4.0 to 2.4.7, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.15, dissectors that support zlib decompression could crash. This was addressed in epan/tvbuff_zlib.c by rejecting negative lengths to avoid a buffer over-read.
CVE-2018-14341
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-19
In Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.1, 2.4.0 to 2.4.7, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.15, the DICOM dissector could go into a large or infinite loop. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-dcm.c by preventing an offset overflow.
CVE-2018-14342
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-19
In Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.1, 2.4.0 to 2.4.7, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.15, the BGP protocol dissector could go into a large loop. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-bgp.c by validating Path Attribute lengths.
CVE-2018-14343
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-19
In Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.1, 2.4.0 to 2.4.7, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.15, the ASN.1 BER dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-ber.c by ensuring that length values do not exceed the maximum signed integer.