Attacks/Breaches

12/19/2014
05:00 PM
50%
50%

Obama: U.S. Will Respond 'Proportionately' To Sony Cyber Attack

President Obama says the United States will take action against North Korea in response to the cyber-attack on Sony.

In remarks to the media, U.S. President Barack Obama today promised that the United States would respond to the cyber-attack against Sony Pictures "proportionately," but did not detail what that response would be.

The FBI officially named North Korea today as the culprit behind the attack.

"We will respond," Obama says. "We will respond proportionately and we'll respond in a place and time and manner that we choose. It is not something that I will announce here today at a press conference. More broadly though, this points to the need for us to work with the international community to start setting up some very clear rules of the road in terms of how the Internet and cyber operates."

He also called upon Congress to work with the White House to pass legislation that facilitates the sharing of cyber-threat information.

"If we don't put in place the kind of architecture that can prevent these attacks from taking place, this is not just going to be affecting movies, this is going to be affecting our entire economy in ways that are extraordinarily significant," he says.

According to the FBI, a technical analysis of the data-deletion malware used in the attack revealed links to other malware the FBI believes was developed by North Koreans. In addition, the FBI noticed what it called a significant overlap between the infrastructure used in the Sony attack and other malicious cyber activity that has been previously linked directly to North Korea. For example, several Internet Protocol (IP) addresses associated with known North Korean infrastructure communicated with IP addresses that were hardcoded into the data-deletion malware used in the attack.

Finally, the tools used in the Sony attack have similarities to a cyber attack in March of last year against South Korean banks and media outlets, which was carried out by North Korea, according to the FBI. With blame officially placed on the country's government, the question now becomes about how the United States should respond.

"Instead of going on the offensive, I believe the better option is focus on defense," opines Ken Westin, security analyst for Tripwire. "It has become clear that Sony had woefully inadequate security policies and controls in place. Businesses need to start taking some responsibility for implementing better security, not just for their own business, but the impact it has on their community and nation as whole."

Economic sanctions would be the logical retaliatory measure, but in the case of North Korea, there's nothing to sanction, argues Michael Sutton, vice president of security research at Zscaler.

"You can…rest assured that offensive cyber operations are already underway, not so much for retaliation, but for intelligence gathering," Sutton says. "The extent of the [Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE)] breach took everyone by surprise, the US government included, and there are a number of three-letter agencies that want to know the true capabilities of Unit 121, North Korea’s military unit focused on offensive cyber actions."

"The more likely immediate and overt repercussions from the SPE breach will come from independent groups, not nation states," he continues. "Hacktivists now have a very direct example of the power that they wield. The decision by SPE to pull The Interview from theaters will influence attackers from now on."

According to a report from CNN, investigators have gathered evidence that hackers stole the user credentials of a system administrator to get access to Sony's computer system. U.S. officials also reportedly told CNN that they do not believe the attack on Sony was an inside job, refuting suspicions that had arisen due to Sony's laying off employees in its technology unit earlier this year.

Obama said he is sympathetic to Sony's plight, but feels the corporation made a mistake in caving to the hackers' demands.

"We cannot have a society in which some dictator someplace can start imposing censorship here in the United States," he says, "because if somebody is able to intimidate folks out of releasing a satirical movie, imagine what they start doing when they see a documentary that they don't like, or news reports they don't like. Or even worse, imagine if producers and distributors and others start engaging in self-censorship because they don't want to offend the sensibilities of somebody whose sensibilities probably need to be offended."

"We'll engage with not just the film industry, but the news industry, the private sector, around these issues," Obama says. "We already have. We will continue to do so. But I think all of us have to anticipate occasionally there are going to be breaches like this. They are going to be costly. They are going to be serious. We take them with the utmost seriousness. But we can't start changing our patterns of behavior anymore then we stop going to a football game because there might be the possibility of a terrorist attack."

Brian Prince is a freelance writer for a number of IT security-focused publications. Prior to becoming a freelance reporter, he worked at eWEEK for five years covering not only security, but also a variety of other subjects in the tech industry. Before that, he worked as a ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
12/28/2014 | 10:45:28 AM
Re: Go offensive
True. They must have been downloading data for a while. This is not something that can be downloaded quickly unless they compromised physical backup types or disks they must have been working on it quite some time, giving the fact that wide area bandwidth is not generally high.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
12/28/2014 | 10:42:04 AM
Re: Sony is just another company that is wide open
Malware similarities are mainly irrelevant if it is already released to public. There has to be better evidence than that to convince other about it.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
12/28/2014 | 10:39:27 AM
Re: Sony is just another company that is wide open
There may not be any opportunities after all. The risk is that if we constantly get what the treat is wrong, it is not going to be easy go us to avoid them in the future, simply because we could not be building an international coalition to overcome difficulties.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
12/28/2014 | 10:35:19 AM
Get even?
There is growing group of experts believe that there is no enough evidence that two my attack is dine by North Korea. So our focus should be offensive for sure but not attacking to other countries infrastructure. We need to our offensive approaches to close the vulnerability holes including super admins being fired and going against the company assets.
SgS125
50%
50%
SgS125,
User Rank: Ninja
12/23/2014 | 8:55:54 AM
Re: Sony is just another company that is wide open
OH my, I'm not saying any three letter agency has hacked anyone, just pointing out that an opportunity like this one never gets wasted.  By either side.
ODA155
50%
50%
ODA155,
User Rank: Ninja
12/22/2014 | 2:51:14 PM
Re: Sony is just another company that is wide open
@SgS125... stevew928... Personally, I believe what I see and not the person who yells the loudest or tries to insult the worst, what I do believe is that Sony has (currently) and has had poor security practices for a while. Again, as I've mentioned this is not their first or second rodeo. Nobody can 100% protect their networks from intrusion, but in my opinion three hacks in 5 years lays the problem squarley at Sony's doorstep, regardless who hacked them.

Here's a question(s) for you... what would any "three letter agency" have to gain by hacking Sony and blaming in on N.K.? This can out today... "The North Koreans said they didn't hack Sony, but be prepared for more."... if they didn't do it, why would they make that threat... are they working with our "three letter agencies"...? Why Sony and not a sewage treatment plant or some power generation plant in Montana or Washington?

Oh yeah, I did see the reports of"Regin".
SgS125
50%
50%
SgS125,
User Rank: Ninja
12/22/2014 | 2:03:20 PM
Re: Sony is just another company that is wide open
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/11/24/secret-regin-malware-belgacom-nsa-gchq/

 

So on November 24th we hear about US Malware, then on Dec 1st we hear warnings about "new" malware threat that turns into Sony hack.

Plenty of other news artciles out there on interesting structure of the malware found to be close to stuxnet with signitures supposodly tying the brits.  But hey who should we believe these days? right?  Becuase our three letter agencies have always been truthiness in their answers.  
stevew928
50%
50%
stevew928,
User Rank: Strategist
12/22/2014 | 1:45:12 PM
Re: Go offensive
Inside job.
stevew928
50%
50%
stevew928,
User Rank: Strategist
12/22/2014 | 1:43:53 PM
Re: Sony is just another company that is wide open
I think so. You've been listening to too much media, I suppose and possibly trusting the President. Check the link I posted above to get you started.
stevew928
50%
50%
stevew928,
User Rank: Strategist
12/22/2014 | 1:41:16 PM
Re: Sony is just another company that is wide open
Not necessarily. They've cooked up some talking points, for sure. Beyond that, who (that can actually make a difference) is going to question it?

You might want to follow this:

marcrogers (dot) org/2014/12/18/why-the-sony-hack-is-unlikely-to-be-the-work-of-north-korea/
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Crowdsourced vs. Traditional Pen Testing
Alex Haynes, Chief Information Security Officer, CDL,  3/19/2019
BEC Scammer Pleads Guilty
Dark Reading Staff 3/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
Organizations are responding to new threats with new processes for detecting and mitigating them. Here's a look at how the discipline of incident response is evolving.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-18913
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
Opera before 57.0.3098.106 is vulnerable to a DLL Search Order hijacking attack where an attacker can send a ZIP archive composed of an HTML page along with a malicious DLL to the target. Once the document is opened, it may allow the attacker to take full control of the system from any location with...
CVE-2018-20031
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
A Denial of Service vulnerability related to preemptive item deletion in lmgrd and vendor daemon components of FlexNet Publisher version 11.16.1.0 and earlier allows a remote attacker to send a combination of messages to lmgrd or the vendor daemon, causing the heartbeat between lmgrd and the vendor ...
CVE-2018-20032
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
A Denial of Service vulnerability related to message decoding in lmgrd and vendor daemon components of FlexNet Publisher version 11.16.1.0 and earlier allows a remote attacker to send a combination of messages to lmgrd or the vendor daemon, causing the heartbeat between lmgrd and the vendor daemon t...
CVE-2018-20034
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
A Denial of Service vulnerability related to adding an item to a list in lmgrd and vendor daemon components of FlexNet Publisher version 11.16.1.0 and earlier allows a remote attacker to send a combination of messages to lmgrd or the vendor daemon, causing the heartbeat between lmgrd and the vendor ...
CVE-2019-3855
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
An integer overflow flaw which could lead to an out of bounds write was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way packets are read from the server. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to execute code on the client system when a user connects to the server.