Attacks/Breaches
3/9/2009
02:21 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

No User Action Required In Newly Discovered PDF Attack

Malicious PDF sitting on hard drive can generate attacks exploiting unpatched Adobe Reader and Acrobat flaw, researcher finds

Merely storing -- without opening -- a malicious PDF file can trigger an attack that exploits the new, unpatched zero-day flaw in Adobe Reader, a researcher has discovered. Didier Stevens, a researcher and IT security consultant with Contrast Europe NV, today released a proof-of-concept demonstration that shows how a file infected with the Adobe flaw can trigger a new attack when the machine uses Windows Indexing Services. And the user doesn't even have to open or select the document.

In addition, Stevens last week released a proof-of-concept demonstrating how PDF files could be exploited with minimal user interaction -- just saving it to the hard drive and viewing it in Windows Explorer.

But this latest attack vector is more risky, he says, because the user doesn't have to do anything with the file at all. "It requires no user interaction, and for the Windows Indexing Service, it can lead to total system compromise [with] privilege escalation," Stevens says.

Windows Indexing Service is an operating system-level feature that provides an index of files on the system.

Adobe first reported the buffer overflow flaw in Adobe Reader and Acrobat on Feb. 20; initially, security experts advised disabling JavaScript in order to defend against any attacks that exploited the vulnerability. But after further research on the vulnerability, it turns out disabling JavaScript isn't always enough. "The vulnerability is not in the scripting engine, and, therefore, disabling JavaScript does not eliminate all risk," Adobe said in a blog post.

Adobe plans to release updates to address the vulnerability starting this week: By March 11, it will update Adobe Reader 9 and Acrobat 9, and by March 18, Adobe Reader 7 and 8 and Acrobat 7 and 8.

Stevens' latest attack demonstrates how an infected PDF sitting on a Windows XP SP2 machine -- with Windows Indexing Services and Adobe Acrobat Reader 9 running -- gets "indexed." Then the malware is executed, allowing for a privilege escalation attack. Stevens recommends disabling the indexing services' ability to index PDFs.

Why the seemingly increase in threats to documents like PDFs? It's all about the bad guys looking for new ways to get malware past filters. "Sending executables via e-mail is not as effective as it used to be. Many enterprises, free e-mail providers, and AV products block attached executables. So malware authors are looking for other vectors and are starting to use document formats, like MS Office formats and PDF," Stevens says. "Document attachments are rarely blocked."

Meanwhile, Stevens says since this was just another method of exploiting the Adobe zero-day bug, he didn't report it to Adobe first. "If this would have been a new bug in Acrobat, I would have disclosed this to Adobe and not made it public before a patch was available. But since this is another way to exploit the zero-day that was reported to Adobe in February, I made it public so users and administrators can take appropriate actions," he says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Security Technologies to Watch in 2017
Emerging tools and services promise to make a difference this year. Are they on your company's list?
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
In past years, security researchers have discovered ways to hack cars, medical devices, automated teller machines, and many other targets. Dark Reading Executive Editor Kelly Jackson Higgins hosts researcher Samy Kamkar and Levi Gundert, vice president of threat intelligence at Recorded Future, to discuss some of 2016's most unusual and creative hacks by white hats, and what these new vulnerabilities might mean for the coming year.