Attacks/Breaches

7/13/2018
05:35 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Mueller Probe Yields Hacking Indictments for 12 Russian Military Officers

GRU hackers used bitcoin to fund US computer network infrastructure supporting and hiding the operation.

Twelve Russian military officers have been indicted on hacking charges as part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein today announced the indictment handed down by a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia.

The charges come on the eve of President Donald Trump's meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin on Monday in Helsinki, where Trump has promised to raise US concerns over election-meddling. The indictment says the Russian officials allegedly hacked into the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), and employees of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign, and waged strategic leaks online in an effort to damage Clinton's candidacy.

Eleven of the defendants are charged with conspiracy to commit computer crimes, eight counts of aggravated identity theft, and money-laundering conspiracy. Two of the defendants face charges of conspiracy to commit computer crimes.

The hacking indictment syncs with US intelligence agencies' previous conclusion that Russian nation-state actors had engaged in a widespread hacking, leaking, and social media influence campaign to sway the election toward Trump. Mueller's team in June accused 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities for a massive operation intended to interfere with the 2016 US presidential election that included bot operations and named the Internet Research Agency in Russia as the center of the operation.

Today's indictment reveals that the Russian GRU officers also breached a state election board's website and stole information on 500,000 voters, as well as the systems at a company that supplied software that verified voter registration information.

"They targeted state and local offices responsible for administering the elections, and they sent spear phishing emails to people involved in administering elections, including attaching malicious software," Rosenstein said in a press conference today.

But like the historic DoJ indictments of Chinese military officers by the US Department of Justice in May 2014, the Russian military indictment is more of a political statement: It's unlikely the named suspects will ever face the US judicial system. US and Russia have no extradition agreements. 

Among some of the key details in the indictment was that to mask their location in Russia, the suspects used a network of US-based computers paid for via bitcoin cryptocurrency.

In addition, the indictment reveals that even after the Russian APT operatives' malware was removed from DNC systems in June 2016, some of the malware (X-Agent) remained on a Linux server. "Despite these efforts, a Linux-based version of X-Agent, programmed to communicate with the GRU-registered domain linuxkrnel.net, remained on the DNC network until in or around October 2016."

The affected system or systems was, according to the DNC, quarantined, however. "This Linux based version of X-agent malware was a remnant of the original hack and had been quarantined during the remediation process in June 2016," a DNC spokesperson said. "While programmed to communicate with a GRU-registered domain, we do not have any information to suggest that it successfully communicated, exfiltrated data, corrupted our newly built systems, or breached our voter file following the remediation process."

What the Mueller investigation's findings show via the indictment is that even nation-state intelligence officers can be unmasked, says John Bambenek, director of cybersecurity research for ThreatStop. "The broader story is how hard privacy is on the Internet. The [investigators] were able to turn them into names because their fingerprints were all over the place. Even intel agencies are having a hard time," Bambenek says.

"This is far from over," says Jim Zuffoletti, CEO of Social SafeGuard, a startup that provides a social platform security service. "Think of all the different places this stolen data could be, incriminating data. They may be finding it years from now."

Security and intel experts say the next shoe to drop from Mueller's investigation is likely to be an indictment of American citizens who interacted with the Russian hackers and operatives. Today's filing doesn't name any US citizens, but it does include a tidbit that a candidate for a US congressional seat in 2016 reached out to the attackers' Guccifer 2.0 persona for stolen information on his or her political opponent. Guccifer 2.0 sent the candidate the requested documents.

"They are going to have a bad rest of their life" when his or her name is released, Bambenek says of the congressional candidate. "I think the inclusion of that wasn't accidental. It was probably a way to say it wasn't just the Russians operating alone."

Another tidbit from the indictment: More than one GRU unit was behind the hacks. "The first of these units, Unit 26165, resembles APT28, the operator who we originally suspected of carrying out the DNC incident. The second of these two units, Unit 74455, is implicated in incidents affecting election systems," says John Hultquist, director on intelligence analysis at FireEye.  

Meantime, Otavio Freire, CTO of Social SafeGuard, says the indictments show how social media played a pivotal role in the Russian military's attack on the DNC. "The visibility of staffers in social media as well as private communications (DMs) and social media accounts needw a major security upgrade to avoid a new cycle in November," he says.  Securing email is only part of the leaked communications challenge."

Related Content:

 

 

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
7/17/2018 | 11:14:06 AM
Re: General aim of Putin
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
7/16/2018 | 8:00:41 AM
General aim of Putin
If you watch his actions, he is a disturber of the peace - just likes to gum up the works for everybody else in the world - to the benefit of Russia.  Here he was generally just aiming to cause discontent in the US election process, seed all kinds of emotions for both Clinton and Trump and make people just not trust the process.  Any discontent plays his game.  To this end he has succeeded quite well.  
Worst Password Blunders of 2018 Hit Organizations East and West
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  12/12/2018
8 Security Tips to Gift Your Loved Ones For the Holidays
Steve Zurier, Freelance Writer,  12/18/2018
How to Engage Your Cyber Enemies
Guy Nizan, CEO at Intsights Cyber Intelligence,  12/18/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
[Sponsored Content] The State of Encryption and How to Improve It
[Sponsored Content] The State of Encryption and How to Improve It
Encryption and access controls are considered to be the ultimate safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of data, which is why they're mandated in so many compliance and regulatory standards. While the cybersecurity market boasts a wide variety of encryption technologies, many data breaches reveal that sensitive and personal data has often been left unencrypted and, therefore, vulnerable.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-16883
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-19
sssd versions from 1.13.0 to before 2.0.0 did not properly restrict access to the infopipe according to the "allowed_uids" configuration parameter. If sensitive information were stored in the user directory, this could be inadvertently disclosed to local attackers.
CVE-2018-17192
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-19
The X-Frame-Options headers were applied inconsistently on some HTTP responses, resulting in duplicate or missing security headers. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. Mitigation: The fix to consistently apply the security headers was applied on th...
CVE-2018-17193
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-19
The message-page.jsp error page used the value of the HTTP request header X-ProxyContextPath without sanitization, resulting in a reflected XSS attack. Mitigation: The fix to correctly parse and sanitize the request attribute value was applied on the Apache NiFi 1.8.0 release. Users running a prior ...
CVE-2018-17194
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-19
When a client request to a cluster node was replicated to other nodes in the cluster for verification, the Content-Length was forwarded. On a DELETE request, the body was ignored, but if the initial request had a Content-Length value other than 0, the receiving nodes would wait for the body and even...
CVE-2018-17195
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-19
The template upload API endpoint accepted requests from different domain when sent in conjunction with ARP spoofing + man in the middle (MiTM) attack, resulting in a CSRF attack. The required attack vector is complex, requiring a scenario with client certificate authentication, same subnet access, a...