Attacks/Breaches
1/4/2012
02:59 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%
Repost This

Latest SQL Injection Campaign Infects 1 Million Web Pages

SANS warns of uptick in 'Lilupophilupop' attack, but Cisco says total number of infected URLs might be 'inflated'

Another SQL injection campaign is literally going viral, with some 1 million URLs possibly infected.

The SANS Internet Storm Center over the weekend counted some 1,070,000 URLs injected with the so-called lilupophilupop.com malware. That's up from 80 pages it had found in early December, according to SANS ISC handler Mark Hofman.

The attackers compromise sites via SQL injection, and it appears to have hit sites worldwide, with the most infections in The Netherlands "NL" domain, with 123,000, and includes some .com and .org sites, as well.

"At the moment it looks like it is partially automated and partially manual. The manual component and the number of sites infected suggests a reasonable size work force or a long preparation period," Hofman said in his blog post on the attack.

But the 1 million URL number might be inflated, says Mary Landesmann, senior security researcher for ScanSafe, which is part of Cisco. That count could include pages also discussing the attacks, she says. "As a result, there is always a huge 'increase' after an initial public report is made. In other words, counting the number of results from a search engine isn’t a good or viable means of measuring the breadth of a compromise," Landesmann says.

Cisco has seen around 650 unique domains hit since lilupophilupop attack first showed up at the end of November. Around 43 percent of the infections transpired between Nov. 30 and Dec. 2, according to Landesmann. "The domains that are affected seem pretty random and small, so I suspect spam or some other social-engineering method is driving victims to the compromised sites, in addition to SEO poisoning," she says.

Mass SQL injection attacks are nothing new. The most recent one, Lizamoon, hit some 500,000 URLs with redirects that push rogue AV software, but was quickly shut down. Automated exploitation is generated via a toolkit built for a specific attack, as was the case with Lizamoon. These attacks typically target a specific application architecture.

[How to prevent SQL injection attacks. See As SQL Injection Attacks Surge, New Report Offers Insight On How To Prevent Them.]

SQL injection basically manipulates an existing SQL query for malicious purposes -- an attacker can take full control over the underlying operating system of the SQL server as well as the Web application.

Unfortunately, SQL injection flaws are consistently some of the most prevalent ones in Web servers.

The lilupophilupop attacks represent one of the biggest SQL injection attacks recently, but it's still much smaller than the size of previous campaigns a few years ago, Cisco's Landesmann says.

"SQL injection isn’t the result of any specific vulnerability, but rather a result of improper input/output handling by the site. It will never entirely go away, but it’s definitely a much, much smaller problem today," she says. "Major hosting providers, large companies, and commercial sites have taken great strides to mitigate their susceptibility and, as a result, the days of a million plus pages/sites impacted by SQLi are probably well behind us."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Senior Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise Magazine, ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Bprince
50%
50%
Bprince,
User Rank: Ninja
1/6/2012 | 11:36:26 PM
re: Latest SQL Injection Campaign Infects 1 Million Web Pages
For the developers: finding SQL injection and other vulnerabilities in code:
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Secur...
Brian Prince, InformationWeek/Dark Reading Comment Moderator
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2012-3946
Published: 2014-04-24
Cisco IOS before 15.3(2)S allows remote attackers to bypass interface ACL restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by sending IPv6 packets in an unspecified scenario in which expected packet drops do not occur for "a small percentage" of the packets, aka Bug ID CSCty73682.

CVE-2012-5723
Published: 2014-04-24
Cisco ASR 1000 devices with software before 3.8S, when BDI routing is enabled, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted (1) broadcast or (2) multicast ICMP packets with fragmentation, aka Bug ID CSCub55948.

CVE-2013-6738
Published: 2014-04-24
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM SmartCloud Analytics Log Analysis 1.1 and 1.2 before 1.2.0.0-CSI-SCALA-IF0003 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an invalid query parameter in a response from an OAuth authorization endpoint.

CVE-2014-0188
Published: 2014-04-24
The openshift-origin-broker in Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 2.0.5, 1.2.7, and earlier does not properly handle authentication requests from the remote-user auth plugin, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and impersonate arbitrary users via the X-Remote-User header in a request to...

CVE-2014-2391
Published: 2014-04-24
The password recovery service in Open-Xchange AppSuite before 7.2.2-rev20, 7.4.1 before 7.4.1-rev11, and 7.4.2 before 7.4.2-rev13 makes an improper decision about the sensitivity of a string representing a previously used but currently invalid password, which allows remote attackers to obtain potent...

Best of the Web