Attacks/Breaches
4/10/2014
02:20 PM
Marilyn Cohodas
Marilyn Cohodas
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Flash Poll: Broken Heartbeat

What steps do you plan to take in response to the Heartbleed bug? Take our poll and share your reasons in the comments.

If your website hasn’t been broken by the now infamous Heartbleed bug (and it probably hasn’t) that doesn’t mean you’re out of danger either as a member of an enterprise security team or as an end-user banking, shopping, or just plain surfing online.

Considered one of the biggest Internet security events ever (security guru Bruce Schneier ranks it 11 on a scale of 1-10),  the flaw has been quietly existing out in the wild for two years. Now, after the widespread publicity this week, experts predict it will become an even more popular attack vector, exposing millions of passwords and personal information, including credit-card numbers, email accounts, and a wide range of online commerce.

The implications for organizations are serious -- and ongoing. As Bishop Fox security analyst Tim Sapio observes in Heartbleed: Examining The Impact, "One thing is certain: If you do not take measures now against this bug, you will be hacked sooner rather than later. The attack is simply too easy to perform."

In his blog, Sapio offers prescriptive advice and resources about how to patch the flawed "Heartbeat" function of TLS, or filter out Heartbeat requests before they reach vulnerable devices. But as you consider and deploy options, we hope you will share your plans and concerns with other members of the Dark Reading community by participating in our flash poll: Broken Heartbeat.

Here’s our question: What steps do you plan to take in response to the Heartbleed bug? You can check all of the responses that apply, and, if we’ve missed a tactic you’re considering, you can tell us in the comments. We also hope you’ll use this poll as a forum to discuss ongoing issues as implications of the bug become clearer over time. For now, your responses to the poll include:

  • We have installed, or are in the process of installing, the OpenSSL Heartbeat update/fix
  • We’re replacing digital certificates
  • We’re forcing end-users to change passwords
  • We’re not doing anything; costs too much
  • What’s the Heartbleed bug?
  • Other (Please explain in the comments)

Click here to take the poll, then let’s chat about it in the comments.

Marilyn has been covering technology for business, government, and consumer audiences for over 20 years. Prior to joining UBM, Marilyn worked for nine years as editorial director at TechTarget Inc., where she launched six Websites for IT managers and administrators supporting ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-0750
Published: 2015-05-22
The administrative web interface in Cisco Hosted Collaboration Solution (HCS) 10.6(1) and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via crafted input to unspecified fields, aka Bug ID CSCut02786.

CVE-2012-1978
Published: 2015-05-21
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Simple PHP Agenda 2.2.8 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add an administrator via a request to auth/process.php, (2) delete an administrator via a request to auth/admi...

CVE-2015-0741
Published: 2015-05-21
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Cisco Prime Central for Hosted Collaboration Solution (PC4HCS) 10.6(1) and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCut04596.

CVE-2015-0742
Published: 2015-05-21
The Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) application in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.2(0.0), 9.2(0.104), 9.2(3.1), 9.2(3.4), 9.3(1.105), 9.3(2.100), 9.4(0.115), 100.13(0.21), 100.13(20.3), 100.13(21.9), and 100.14(1.1) does not properly implement multicast-forwarding registrati...

CVE-2015-0746
Published: 2015-05-21
The REST API in Cisco Access Control Server (ACS) 5.5(0.46.2) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (API outage) by sending many requests, aka Bug ID CSCut62022.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join security and risk expert John Pironti and Dark Reading Editor-in-Chief Tim Wilson for a live online discussion of the sea-changing shift in security strategy and the many ways it is affecting IT and business.