Attacks/Breaches

4/18/2018
09:40 PM
50%
50%

70% of Energy Firms Worry About Physical Damage from Cyberattacks

High-profile ICS attacks Triton/Trisis, Industroyer/CrashOverride, and Stuxnet have driven energy firms to invest more in cybersecurity, survey shows.

RSA CONFERENCE 2018 - San Francisco - Operational outages and shutdowns and physical injury to employees due to cyberattacks are among the main worries of more than 95% energy and oil & gas firms, a new survey shows.

Some 70% worry that cyberattacks could yield catastrophic results, such as explosions, according to the Dimensional Research study conducted on behalf of Tripwire. The report surveyed 151 IT and technology (OT) security professionals at energy and oil and gas companies. Some 65% say their organizations properly invest in ICS security, while 56% of those without sufficient security budgets say it would take a major cyberattack to pressure thier firm to properly invest in security. 

Ransomware has been slightly more of an incentive for energy firms to increase their ICS security (45%), followed closely by Triton/Trisis and Industroyer/Crashoverride (44%). Stuxnet inspired 11% to up their security budgets.

Some 35% of the firms employ multiple layers of security for their ICS systems, while 34% concentrate on securing their networks and 14%, their ICS devices.

Read more here

 

 

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
How the US Chooses Which Zero-Day Vulnerabilities to Stockpile
Ricardo Arroyo, Senior Technical Product Manager, Watchguard Technologies,  1/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3906
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 contains hardcoded credentials in the WCF service on port 9003. An authenticated remote attacker can use these credentials to access the badge system database and modify its contents.
CVE-2019-3907
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 stores user credentials and other sensitive information with a known weak encryption method (MD5 hash of a salt and password).
CVE-2019-3908
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 stores backup files as encrypted zip files. The password to the zip is hard-coded and unchangeable. An attacker with access to these backups can decrypt them and obtain sensitive data.
CVE-2019-3909
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 database uses default credentials. Users are unable to change the credentials without vendor intervention.
CVE-2019-3910
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Crestron AM-100 before firmware version 1.6.0.2 contains an authentication bypass in the web interface's return.cgi script. Unauthenticated remote users can use the bypass to access some administrator functionality such as configuring update sources and rebooting the device.