Attacks/Breaches
10/22/2012
04:52 PM
50%
50%

Who Is Hacking U.S. Banks? 8 Facts

Hackers have labeled the bank website disruptions as grassroots-level reprisal for an anti-Islamic film. But is the Iranian government really backing the attacks?
Previous
7 of 8
Next


Each of the recent DDoS attacks against U.S. financial institutions have this in common: The Izz ad-din Al qassam cyber fighters have claimed credit, and the same PHP-based toolkit, "itsoknoproblembro," has been used to launch at least some of the DDoS attacks involved.

First, the attackers must install the toolkit on targeted servers. "The malicious actors make use of Web application vulnerabilities on thousands of different Web servers in order to drop various flavors of the itsoknoproblembro PHP scripts into available directories," according to the Prolexic report. "Once the files are written to the server, attackers are able to access them to perform unauthorized system functions, check on the bot's status, or launch DDoS attacks."

DDoS attacks today focus both on infrastructure (layers 3 and 4) as well as applications (layer 7), according to Prolexic.

Unlike botnets, Prolexic said that itsoknoproblembro infections aren't managed using a command-and-control (C&C) server, in which infected endpoints retrieve commands from a botmaster. Instead, the itsoknoproblembro infections are controlled by pushing commands to them.

The versatile toolkit can be used to infect a number of different systems. "Itsoknoproblembro scripts have been discovered on servers hosting a variety of platforms, including Awstats, WordPress, Joomla, Plesk, and many others. For example, one of the more popular recent infection vectors is the exploitation of vulnerability within the Joomla Bluestork theme," according to the report.

Unfortunately for U.S. banks, or anyone else targeted via itsoknoproblembro, the vulnerabilities exploited by the toolkit remain hard to fix. "Cleanup efforts for itsoknoproblembro have been extremely difficult and taxing on security experts," according to Prolexic. "Coupled with outdated Web applications and inexperienced administrators, it will be extremely difficult to effectively remediate this infection." While further efforts are underway to find new ways to spot and block related attacks, so far there's been no quick-fix defensive measure discovered.

RECOMMENDED READING

Iran Denies Hacking American Banks, Censors Google

PNC Bank Hit By Crowdsourced Hacktivist Attacks

Bank Site Attacks Trigger Ongoing Outages, Customer Anger

Bank Hacks: 7 Misunderstood Facts

Hackers Launch New Wave Of U.S. Bank Attacks

U.S. Bank Hacks Expand; Regions Financial Hit

Bank Hacks: Iran Blame Game Intensifies

DOD: Hackers Breached U.S. Critical Infrastructure Control Systems

Previous
7 of 8
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Leo Regulus
50%
50%
Leo Regulus,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/24/2012 | 4:52:32 PM
re: Who Is Hacking U.S. Banks? 8 Facts
Very disappointed in Editor's choice of article format. This has been extensively discussed in the past.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-6477
Published: 2014-11-23
Unspecified vulnerability in the JPublisher component in Oracle Database Server 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-4290, CVE-2014-4291, CVE-2014-4292, CVE-2014-4...

CVE-2014-4807
Published: 2014-11-22
Sterling Order Management in IBM Sterling Selling and Fulfillment Suite 9.3.0 before FP8 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a '\0' character.

CVE-2014-6183
Published: 2014-11-22
IBM Security Network Protection 5.1 before 5.1.0.0 FP13, 5.1.1 before 5.1.1.0 FP8, 5.1.2 before 5.1.2.0 FP9, 5.1.2.1 before FP5, 5.2 before 5.2.0.0 FP5, and 5.3 before 5.3.0.0 FP1 on XGS devices allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-8626
Published: 2014-11-22
Stack-based buffer overflow in the date_from_ISO8601 function in ext/xmlrpc/libxmlrpc/xmlrpc.c in PHP before 5.2.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code by including a timezone field in a date, leading to improper XML-RPC encoding...

CVE-2014-8710
Published: 2014-11-22
The decompress_sigcomp_message function in epan/sigcomp-udvm.c in the SigComp UDVM dissector in Wireshark 1.10.x before 1.10.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read and application crash) via a crafted packet.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?