Attacks/Breaches
10/22/2012
04:52 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%
Repost This

Who Is Hacking U.S. Banks? 8 Facts

Hackers have labeled the bank website disruptions as grassroots-level reprisal for an anti-Islamic film. But is the Iranian government really backing the attacks?
Previous
7 of 8
Next


Each of the recent DDoS attacks against U.S. financial institutions have this in common: The Izz ad-din Al qassam cyber fighters have claimed credit, and the same PHP-based toolkit, "itsoknoproblembro," has been used to launch at least some of the DDoS attacks involved.

First, the attackers must install the toolkit on targeted servers. "The malicious actors make use of Web application vulnerabilities on thousands of different Web servers in order to drop various flavors of the itsoknoproblembro PHP scripts into available directories," according to the Prolexic report. "Once the files are written to the server, attackers are able to access them to perform unauthorized system functions, check on the bot's status, or launch DDoS attacks."

DDoS attacks today focus both on infrastructure (layers 3 and 4) as well as applications (layer 7), according to Prolexic.

Unlike botnets, Prolexic said that itsoknoproblembro infections aren't managed using a command-and-control (C&C) server, in which infected endpoints retrieve commands from a botmaster. Instead, the itsoknoproblembro infections are controlled by pushing commands to them.

The versatile toolkit can be used to infect a number of different systems. "Itsoknoproblembro scripts have been discovered on servers hosting a variety of platforms, including Awstats, WordPress, Joomla, Plesk, and many others. For example, one of the more popular recent infection vectors is the exploitation of vulnerability within the Joomla Bluestork theme," according to the report.

Unfortunately for U.S. banks, or anyone else targeted via itsoknoproblembro, the vulnerabilities exploited by the toolkit remain hard to fix. "Cleanup efforts for itsoknoproblembro have been extremely difficult and taxing on security experts," according to Prolexic. "Coupled with outdated Web applications and inexperienced administrators, it will be extremely difficult to effectively remediate this infection." While further efforts are underway to find new ways to spot and block related attacks, so far there's been no quick-fix defensive measure discovered.

RECOMMENDED READING

Iran Denies Hacking American Banks, Censors Google

PNC Bank Hit By Crowdsourced Hacktivist Attacks

Bank Site Attacks Trigger Ongoing Outages, Customer Anger

Bank Hacks: 7 Misunderstood Facts

Hackers Launch New Wave Of U.S. Bank Attacks

U.S. Bank Hacks Expand; Regions Financial Hit

Bank Hacks: Iran Blame Game Intensifies

DOD: Hackers Breached U.S. Critical Infrastructure Control Systems

Previous
7 of 8
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Leo Regulus
50%
50%
Leo Regulus,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/24/2012 | 4:52:32 PM
re: Who Is Hacking U.S. Banks? 8 Facts
Very disappointed in Editor's choice of article format. This has been extensively discussed in the past.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2012-3946
Published: 2014-04-24
Cisco IOS before 15.3(2)S allows remote attackers to bypass interface ACL restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by sending IPv6 packets in an unspecified scenario in which expected packet drops do not occur for "a small percentage" of the packets, aka Bug ID CSCty73682.

CVE-2012-5723
Published: 2014-04-24
Cisco ASR 1000 devices with software before 3.8S, when BDI routing is enabled, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted (1) broadcast or (2) multicast ICMP packets with fragmentation, aka Bug ID CSCub55948.

CVE-2013-6738
Published: 2014-04-24
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM SmartCloud Analytics Log Analysis 1.1 and 1.2 before 1.2.0.0-CSI-SCALA-IF0003 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an invalid query parameter in a response from an OAuth authorization endpoint.

CVE-2014-0188
Published: 2014-04-24
The openshift-origin-broker in Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 2.0.5, 1.2.7, and earlier does not properly handle authentication requests from the remote-user auth plugin, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and impersonate arbitrary users via the X-Remote-User header in a request to...

CVE-2014-2391
Published: 2014-04-24
The password recovery service in Open-Xchange AppSuite before 7.2.2-rev20, 7.4.1 before 7.4.1-rev11, and 7.4.2 before 7.4.2-rev13 makes an improper decision about the sensitivity of a string representing a previously used but currently invalid password, which allows remote attackers to obtain potent...

Best of the Web