Attacks/Breaches
5/9/2012
11:21 AM
50%
50%

Twitter Downplays Breach That Exposed Passwords

Nearly 60,000 Twitter usernames and passwords released via Pastebin, but social networking service says half are for blocked spam accounts or duplicates.

Tens of thousands of Twitter users' email addresses and passwords have been dumped online.

The leaked information, comprising 58,978 username and password combinations, appeared Monday on Pastebin. While Twitter said that it's investigating the breach, it’s also downplayed the supposed size and severity of the data dump.

"We are currently looking into the situation," said spokeswoman Rachel Bremer via email. "It's worth noting that, so far, we've discovered that the list of alleged accounts and passwords found on Pastebin consists of more than 20,000 duplicates, many spam accounts that have already been suspended, and many login credentials that do not appear to be linked (that is, the password and username are not actually associated with each other)."

Most hackers dumping data on Pastebin only divulge a subset of their data, then link to a torrent file for anyone who wants to download the entire data set. But in this case, whoever posted the data simply pasted the information across five different Pastebin posts. (Links: one, two, three, four, and five.) That was necessary since Pastebin imposes a 512 Kb limit on each post.

[ Are you ignoring common social media privacy controls and sharing risks? See Facebook Privacy: 5 Most Ignored Mistakes. ]

While Twitter is continuing its investigation, the company said it's already contacted affected users. "We have pushed out password resets to accounts that may have been affected," said Bremer. "For those who are concerned that their account may have been compromised, we suggest resetting your passwords and more in our Help Center."

Still, few Twitter users would have been affected by the breach. Based on Twitter's estimate of the number of invalid accounts contained in the data dump, and with the social network claiming to now have over 140 million active users, the breach would have affected about 0.02% of its user base.

Who leaked the Twitter account credentials, and why? Thanks to the Pastebin poster remaining anonymous, and no group stepping forward to take credit, that's not clear. But it's quite possible that the leaked credentials were gathered via phishing attacks, which would have tricked users into divulging their details. If so, that would exonerate Twitter and its information security practices.

That question is relevant because last year, as part of its settlement with the Federal Trade Commission settlement, Twitter agreed to improve its information security practices, undergo regular information security audits for 10 years, and avoid making any misleading statements about the effectiveness of its security or privacy practices for the next 20 years.

The settlement stems from an FTC charge that the social network "deceived consumers and put their privacy at risk by failing to safeguard their personal information," after hackers in 2009 twice gained full administrative control of the Twitter site.

As part of the settlement, which was first fielded by the FTC in 2010, Twitter agreed to designate employees to coordinate--as well as be accountable for--its information security and privacy programs. Twitter also agreed to put in place "reasonable safeguards" to mitigate any information security risks it identified, and to store data securely. But by the time the settlement was announced last year, Twitter said it had added almost all of the required security improvements.

Put an end to insider theft and accidental data disclosure with network and host controls--and don't forget to keep employees on their toes. Also in the new, all-digital Stop Data Leaks issue of Dark Reading: Why security must be everyone's concern, and lessons learned from the Global Payments breach. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
timothytim
50%
50%
timothytim,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/25/2012 | 10:11:17 PM
re: Twitter Downplays Breach That Exposed Passwords
My Twitter account was compromised and subsequently suspended. The hacker sent out offensive tweets. I was able to get my account restored, but only after agreeing to not send any more offensive tweets. They won't respond to any request asking to clear the record from my account. In my case, I am 100% certain it was not by phishing. Reason: The email account that was on file at twitter was inactive and I had not updated my twitter account. I did not receive any other twitter related messages at other email accounts. If I am one, you know there are lots (ten's of thousands) of others who also were not phished. And what is the blah blah "Twitter was not compromised" about? If Twitter's customers were compromised then Twitter was compromised. Twitter doesn't exist without its customers. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
Deb Donston-Miller
50%
50%
Deb Donston-Miller,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/9/2012 | 10:41:06 PM
re: Twitter Downplays Breach That Exposed Passwords
Just last week I started seeing a phishing scam in my email inbox, with a Twitter "follower" sending me a direct message saying that someone was "spreading bad rumors" about me. Now, the person whose account was clearly hacked is someone I work with, and I knew that he would never send me a message like that (especially one worded like that). So I knew it wasn't a legitimate message. But I know some teenagers who got the same message, and their Twitter followers might have used language like that. Luckily, my young friends were smart enough not to click on the link. But it's interesting to think about how a phish that doesn't work for one person might work for another or in another context.

Deb Donston-Miller
Contributing Editor, The BrainYard
JBUDDEMEYER000
50%
50%
JBUDDEMEYER000,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/9/2012 | 6:28:14 PM
re: Twitter Downplays Breach That Exposed Passwords
would twitter actually admit the accounts had been accessed? the breach of privacy and security would be tantamount to chaos.
http://littlebiggy.org/4631847
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Latest Comment: nice post
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-1750
Published: 2015-07-01
Open redirect vulnerability in nokia-mapsplaces.php in the Nokia Maps & Places plugin 1.6.6 for WordPress allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in the href parameter to page/place.html. NOTE: this was originally reported as cross-sit...

CVE-2014-1836
Published: 2015-07-01
Absolute path traversal vulnerability in htdocs/libraries/image-editor/image-edit.php in ImpressCMS before 1.3.6 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via a full pathname in the image_path parameter in a cancel action.

CVE-2015-0848
Published: 2015-07-01
Heap-based buffer overflow in libwmf 0.2.8.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted BMP image.

CVE-2015-1330
Published: 2015-07-01
unattended-upgrades before 0.86.1 does not properly authenticate packages when the (1) force-confold or (2) force-confnew dpkg options are enabled in the DPkg::Options::* apt configuration, which allows remote man-in-the-middle attackers to upload and execute arbitrary packages via unspecified vecto...

CVE-2015-1950
Published: 2015-07-01
IBM PowerVC Standard Edition 1.2.2.1 through 1.2.2.2 does not require authentication for access to the Python interpreter with nova credentials, which allows KVM guest OS users to discover certain PowerVC credentials and bypass intended access restrictions via unspecified Python code.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Marc Spitler, co-author of the Verizon DBIR will share some of the lesser-known but most intriguing tidbits from the massive report