Attacks/Breaches
8/3/2011
06:07 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Shady RAT Attack Hit 72 Organizations

McAfee said that the advanced, persistent threat began in 2006, and has targeted government agencies, Olympic Committees, and numerous businesses.

Black Hat
10 Massive Security Breaches
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: 10 Massive Security Breaches
McAfee on Tuesday issued a warning that an attack, which it's dubbed "Shady RAT" for remote access tool, successfully compromised at least 72 organizations, across 14 countries, beginning in 2006.

Victims included government agencies in the United States, Canada and South Korea, defense contractors, and International Olympic Committees in three countries. All told, 49 of the exploited organizations were located in the United States.

McAfee released a related report on Tuesday, saying it first discovered signs of the Shady RAT attack in 2009, after a forensics investigation at a defense contractor found an infection that originated from a spear-phishing attack, which contained attached malware that uses "encrypted HTML comments in Web pages that serve as a command channel to the infected machine." While McAfee didn't name the malware in question, security experts said it sounds like malware that's been traced to a group known as the "Comment Crew."

McAfee found evidence that the Shady RAT attacks began in July 2006, if not before. All told, there were eight related intrusions spotted from 2006, including attacks against a Department of Energy research laboratory, as well as steel and construction companies located in South Korea. Meanwhile, in 2007, attacks increased by 260%, expanding to 29 organizations, including multiple U.S. defense contractors. In 2008, the attack expanded to 38 organizations.

Interestingly, however, the number of attacks declined in 2009 and 2010, "likely due to the widespread availability of the countermeasures for the specific intrusion indicators used by this specific actor," according to the report. The group behind the attack responded by overhauling its command and control infrastructure, at which point McAfee lost sight of the attack in organizations' logs.

McAfee said that based on its investigation, many more organizations have likely been compromised in similar attacks. "Having investigated intrusions such as Operation Aurora and Night Dragon (systemic long-term compromise of Western oil and gas industry), as well as numerous others that have not been disclosed publicly, I am convinced that every company in every conceivable industry with significant size and valuable intellectual property and trade secrets has been compromised (or will be shortly), with the great majority of the victims rarely discovering the intrusion or its impact," said report author Dmitri Alperovitch, vice president of threat research for McAfee, in a blog posted late Tuesday.

"In fact, I divide the entire set of Fortune Global 2000 firms into two categories: those that know they've been compromised and those that don't yet know," he said.

Is Alperovitch's grandiose note justified? APTs have been cited as the cause of breaches affecting RSA SecuriID, Lockheed Martin, and Sony. Furthermore, many security experts suggest that APTs are much more widespread than companies realize.

In the case of Shady RAT, however, it's unclear what attackers actually stole. "From my reading of the 'Shady RAT' report it's unclear whether the analysis of the hackers' logs was able to differentiate between when a junior employee's computer was infected with malware, and when a PC belonging to someone in a more senior position was compromised. The seriousness of the two security breaches would be very different," said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos, in a blog post.

Regardless, so-called APTs are now widespread. According to a Ponemon data breach study involving 50 businesses, released earlier this week, 34% said that they'd faced APTs in 2011. But not every company surveyed may have acknowledged being attacked. Alex Stamos, CTO of security consulting company iSEC Partners, told InformationWeek at the Black Hat conference, a UBM TechWeb event, in Las Vegas on Wednesday that when it comes to APTs, "only a tenth of them are ever reported."

But as with the Night Dragon attacks that used SQL injection, social engineering, and phishing to compromise multiple oil and gas companies, Shady RAT didn't involve a new, undiscovered, or surprisingly sophisticated exploit. Rather, the attack reflects the APT status quo. "It's straight out of the playbook," Tony Sager, chief of the NSA's information assurance directorate, told InformationWeek at Black Hat.

The vendors, contractors, and other outside parties with which you do business can create a serious security risk. Here's how to keep this threat in check. Also in the new, all-digital issue of Dark Reading: Why focusing solely on your own company's security ignores the bigger picture. Download it now. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-1927
Published: 2014-10-25
The shell_quote function in python-gnupg 0.3.5 does not properly quote strings, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors, as demonstrated using "$(" command-substitution sequences, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-1928....

CVE-2014-1928
Published: 2014-10-25
The shell_quote function in python-gnupg 0.3.5 does not properly escape characters, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors, as demonstrated using "\" (backslash) characters to form multi-command sequences, a different vulner...

CVE-2014-1929
Published: 2014-10-25
python-gnupg 0.3.5 and 0.3.6 allows context-dependent attackers to have an unspecified impact via vectors related to "option injection through positional arguments." NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-7323.

CVE-2014-3409
Published: 2014-10-25
The Ethernet Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) handling feature in Cisco IOS 12.2(33)SRE9a and earlier and IOS XE 3.13S and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via malformed CFM packets, aka Bug ID CSCuq93406.

CVE-2014-3636
Published: 2014-10-25
D-Bus 1.3.0 through 1.6.x before 1.6.24 and 1.8.x before 1.8.8 allows local users to (1) cause a denial of service (prevention of new connections and connection drop) by queuing the maximum number of file descriptors or (2) cause a denial of service (disconnect) via multiple messages that combine to...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.