Attacks/Breaches
6/21/2011
12:13 PM
50%
50%

Network Solutions Suffers DDoS Attack

A distributed denial of service attack took down Network Solutions, severing access to DNS servers, websites, plus hosted servers and email accounts.

Strategic Security Survey: Global Threat, LocalPain
Strategic Security Survey: Global Threat, Local Pain
(click image for larger view and for full slideshow)
Network Solutions on Monday apparently began suffering a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack that left its customers unable to access DNS servers, hosted websites, servers, or email accounts.

Reports of outages began appearing late on Monday, and by Tuesday the company was blaming a DDoS attack. "Some customers may see interruptions caused by a ddos distributed denial of service attack. Our network folks are working on it," said multiple posts to the Network Solutions Twitter feed on Tuesday morning.

In a direct response to a customer query on Tuesday, another Network Solutions Twitter message said, "We are dealing with external factors. Your sites are up but dados preventing ppl from reaching. Them"--suggesting a chaotic environment in the support center, as well as the continuing persistence of the DDoS (apparently mistyped as "Dados") attack.

A Network Solution spokesperson didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

"Network Solutions indicated to us that they had a major DoS attack, which crippled their system, and anyone who has a domain name registered with them," said InformationWeek reader Robert N. Goldstein, president and CEO and Hospitality Consultants, via email. "The result was that no access to servers or domains was possible for several hours," beginning at approximately 6:30am on Tuesday, Eastern time.

"Anyone looking for our domains or our exchange mail this morning, could not reach us--'Oops!!!' is all they got," he said. Based on his company's server logs, however, the attack appeared to ease a couple of hours later, as its websites and hosted email again became accessible.

Calls to multiple Network Solutions helpline phone numbers on Tuesday led to a brief message saying that "all trunks are busy, please try your call again," before disconnecting.

Earlier in the day, however, the message was different. "The main greeting at Network Solutions alerted callers that they had a major DDoS attack, though the person who finally answered my call said that they were undergoing a 'system upgrade.' When I challenged him as to the real reason for the system shutdown, he affirmed that it was in fact a service attack," said Goldstein.

A DDoS attack typically floods a target server with packets, leaving it unable to respond to any requests. Attackers often use botnets for this purpose, although groups such as Anonymous have released software, such as Low Orbit Ion Cannon, that people can run from their own PC. (Note, this may lead to arrest.)

Would switching to a different company help Network Solutions customers sidestep DDoS attacks? The answer is, not likely. That's because stopping a DDoS attack can be quite difficult for any organization, even a domain registrar the size of Network Solutions. In 2010, for example, Arbor Networks saw high-end DDoS attacks topping out at 50+ Gbps range, which is enough packet volume to stop even large data centers and carrier backbones.

For comparison's sake, when LulzSec targeted the CIA's externally hosted public website last week, the agency's response was simply to pull the plug on the website and wait out the attack.

Furthermore, attackers are getting savvier about finding network weak points, such as misconfigured domain name servers (DNS), which enables them to create a DDoS using relatively fewer resources.

Black Hat USA 2011 presents a unique opportunity for members of the security industry to gather and discuss the latest in cutting-edge research. It happens July 30-Aug. 4 in Las Vegas. Find out more and register.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-5084
Published: 2015-08-02
The Siemens SIMATIC WinCC Sm@rtClient and Sm@rtClient Lite applications before 01.00.01.00 for Android do not properly store passwords, which allows physically approximate attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5352
Published: 2015-08-02
The x11_open_helper function in channels.c in ssh in OpenSSH before 6.9, when ForwardX11Trusted mode is not used, lacks a check of the refusal deadline for X connections, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a connection outside of the permitted time ...

CVE-2015-5537
Published: 2015-08-02
The SSL layer of the HTTPS service in Siemens RuggedCom ROS before 4.2.0 and ROX II does not properly implement CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3566.

CVE-2015-5600
Published: 2015-08-02
The kbdint_next_device function in auth2-chall.c in sshd in OpenSSH through 6.9 does not properly restrict the processing of keyboard-interactive devices within a single connection, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute-force attacks or cause a denial of service (CPU consumptio...

CVE-2015-1009
Published: 2015-07-31
Schneider Electric InduSoft Web Studio before 7.1.3.5 Patch 5 and Wonderware InTouch Machine Edition through 7.1 SP3 Patch 4 use cleartext for project-window password storage, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a file.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
What’s the future of the venerable firewall? We’ve invited two security industry leaders to make their case: Join us and bring your questions and opinions!