Attacks/Breaches
10/15/2012
11:57 AM
50%
50%

LulzSec Attacker Pleads Guilty To Sony Pictures Hack

Defendant agrees to pay restitution toward Sony's $600,000 data breach cleanup costs.

Alleged LulzSec hacker Raynaldo Rivera, 20, has pleaded guilty to one charge against him relating to an attack against the website of Sony Pictures Entertainment. According to authorities, Rivera operated online using the monikers "neuron," "royal," and "wildicv," and was part of the hacktivist group known as Lulz Security, or LulzSec.

The FBI arrested Rivera in August 2012, after a federal grand jury handed down a two-count indictment against him the same month. The indictment charged Rivera with conspiracy and unauthorized impairment of a protected computer. Both charges carry a maximum penalty of 15 years in jail.

In a plea agreement that he signed October 4, 2012, Rivera agreed to plead guilty to the charge of conspiracy, "with the object of the conspiracy being to intentionally cause damage without authorization to a protected computer," which involved a SQL injection attack against the Sony Pictures website, as well as the public release of hundreds of thousands of Sony customers' usernames and passwords.

[ Learn more about How Cybercriminals Choose Their Targets. ]

As part of the plea agreement, the U.S. Attorneys' Office agreed to move to dismiss the unauthorized impairment of a protected computer charge against Rivera, provided he abides by the terms of the agreement. As part of the plea deal, Rivera also acknowledged that he "will be required to pay full restitution to the victim(s) of the offense to which [he] is pleading guilty." Rivera will also face a maximum of 5 years' imprisonment, a three-year supervised release, and a fine of $250,000 "or twice the gross gain or gross loss resulting from the offense, whichever is greatest," according to court documents. As part of the plea bargain, however, the U.S. Attorneys' Office agreed to argue for a shorter jail sentence, provided Rivera takes responsibility for the conspiracy offense.

The ultimate amount of money that Rivera must repay could be substantial. According to court documents, "Sony Pictures suffered losses of approximately $605,663.67 during the one-year period beginning on approximately May 27, 2011, including to hire (sic) computer forensic firms, to staff call centers, and to provide credit monitoring services for individuals whose personal identifying information was compromised."

How was the attack executed? According to court documents, Rivera registered for a proxy service on or about May 23, 2011, "to attempt to hide his true Internet Protocol or 'IP' address from law enforcement while defendant engaged in criminal activity as part of LulzSec."

Then, between about May 27, 2011, and June 2, 2011, according to court documents, Rivera "knowingly caused the transmission of programs, information, codes, and commands, specifically, commands to execute a SQL injection attack against the computer systems of Sony Pictures," which also involved him "stealing confidential data contained on such systems, including personal identifying information for thousands of individuals."

After the attack, Rivera then "provided to members of LulzSec confidential information he had stolen from Sony Pictures' computer systems via the SQL injection attack." The official LulzSec Twitter feed, as well as the lulzsecurity.com website, were also used to publicize the attack, and provide links to the stolen Sony data. According to court documents, "from approximately late May through early June 2011, [Rivera] knowingly combined, conspired, and agreed with other members of LulzSec, including 'sabu,' 'topiary,' 't- flow,' 'kayla,' 'recursion,' 'pwnsauce,' 'joepie,' 'trollpoll,' and 'm_nerva,' to knowingly cause the transmission of codes and commands to the computer systems of Sony Pictures."

According to a Pastebin post uploaded at the same time by LulzSec, in which the group claimed credit for the Sony Pictures website attack, its members claimed to have obtained one million Sony website users' passwords, which had been stored in unencrypted format. "From a single injection, we accessed everything," according to the LulzSec statement. But it said that there had only been time to post 150,000 of the stolen usernames and passwords to the LulzSec website.

Unbeknownst to the LulzSec participants, the group's leader, Sabu, was then busted by two FBI agents on June 7, 2011. Hector Xavier Monsegur, 28, a.k.a. Sabu, immediately turned informer, working with authorities to gather evidence against LulzSec and Anonymous participants, as well as to help identify and patch a number of vulnerabilities in businesses' systems.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
PJS880
50%
50%
PJS880,
User Rank: Ninja
10/16/2012 | 2:43:47 PM
re: LulzSec Attacker Pleads Guilty To Sony Pictures Hack
So he gets a large fine and possible jail time with supervised released? How much money if any did Rivera make fro the information he gained buy attacking Sony pictures. If he did not profit at all from the attack then what exactly was the purpose of the attack? So I didn't catch it or not did Rivera turn informer also?

Paul Sprague
InformationWeek Contributor
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Dark Reading Live EVENTS
INsecurity - For the Defenders of Enterprise Security
A Dark Reading Conference
While red team conferences focus primarily on new vulnerabilities and security researchers, INsecurity puts security execution, protection, and operations center stage. The primary speakers will be CISOs and leaders in security defense; the blue team will be the focus.
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Tell the sysadmin that we have a situation.
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] Assessing Cybersecurity Risk
[Strategic Security Report] Assessing Cybersecurity Risk
As cyber attackers become more sophisticated and enterprise defenses become more complex, many enterprises are faced with a complicated question: what is the risk of an IT security breach? This report delivers insight on how today's enterprises evaluate the risks they face. This report also offers a look at security professionals' concerns about a wide variety of threats, including cloud security, mobile security, and the Internet of Things.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.