Application Security
3/15/2013
02:12 PM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

How University Of Oklahoma Protects Records From Disaster

Enterprise content management helps University Of Oklahoma make student records safer, more accessible.

12 Open Educational Resources: From Khan to MIT
12 Open Educational Resources: From Khan to MIT
(click image for slideshow)
For the head of the academic advising program at the University of Oklahoma College of Arts and Sciences, digital recordkeeping means never having to say "I'm sorry" – as in, "I'm sorry but I don't have that record," or even, "I'm sorry all your student records were lost in the flood."

Rhonda Kyncl, assistant dean for academic services, said she wants to make sure her department is ready when a student comes to that critical checkpoint of entering senior year and reviewing his or her records. This is the moment when the adviser says, "Sure, just complete these courses with a grade of C or better, and you'll be all set to graduate in May," or "Sorry, looks like you're going to come up short." And it would be nice if that answer was correct, based on all the right information being available to prove, for example, that the student had permission to substitute one course for another that's normally required.

"We want to leave the student with a comprehensive record so the student doesn't have to do all that jumping around" of tracking down documents from different teachers and academic departments, Kyncl said.

By moving to a Laserfiche enterprise content management (ECM) system, she has made the advising function digital, replacing paper folders of records with online folders of documents. In addition to keeping the records more organized, the ECM system makes the documents accessible from an iPad or any other tablet or computer. That makes it easier for busy students and busy advisers to meet in a coffee shop or any other convenient location and have all the necessary information instantly available, she said.

[ Are ECM and social really so far apart? Read Myth Of Systems Of Record Vs. Systems Of Engagement. ]

The trick is that not all the required information for a student advising session can be represented in one neat report, Kyncl said. There's always going to be the need to track down documentation for exceptions -- like substituting one course for another -- represented in a departmental memo. The record also includes documents like notes from previous student-adviser meetings. In the course of a meeting for an aspiring graduate, the adviser will also produce documents like a checklist of outstanding requirements the student must meet.

As much as possible, the university now tries to produce these documents digitally from the outset, Kyncl said. However, some still start out on paper -- for example, course add/drop forms and documentation from outside agencies such as the Veterans Administration -- and get scanned in.

Kimberly Samuelson, VP of strategy at Laserfiche, said she is seeing more interest from higher education as the institutions position themselves to operate more efficiently. "They're also seeing technology as being an advantage in the way they position themselves to the student base," she said.

While Kyncl believes she is ahead of many of her peers at other colleges in installing a system like this, she admits she was driven less by forward-thinking inspiration than fear inspired by a near disaster. "The reason we started looking into digital records is we had a flood in our building at the end of 2009. Fortunately, it didn't damage student records -- but it came within about 50 feet of doing that," she said.

Rather than an overflowing river, this flood was caused by a burst water pipe in the water-handling system on the roof, which flowed down into the building for four hours before being discovered by the maintenance staff. Plenty of other records in the building were reduced to a useless, sodden mess, and only by luck did the student records escape. "That really would have been bad -- I don't know what we would have done," Kyncl said.

In some cases, duplicate records would have existed elsewhere around the university, but most of the records for the advising department itself existed only in that one place. "We would have been redoing thousands of files. It would have been a nightmare, and it certainly got us thinking," Kyncl said.

Some of the peers whom she consulted through a university technology email list had started doing digital archiving of documents to protect against such disasters. Yet as Kyncl investigated the options, she thought, "why wouldn't I do that for my processes as well?" So she looked for a system that would manage document creation, organization and everyday access, in addition to archiving.

Kyncl was introduced to Laserfiche by the college admissions director, who was also investigating (and has since implemented) the electronic recordkeeping system. Two other colleges (out of more than a dozen that make up the university) have also implemented it, she said. Although the university's central IT organization has been involved only tangentially, she said, "I think other people are watching what we're doing, since we are a large college."

Follow David F. Carr at @davidfcarr or Google+, along with @IWKEducation.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
DevOps’ Impact on Application Security
DevOps’ Impact on Application Security
Managing the interdependency between software and infrastructure is a thorny challenge. Often, it’s a “developers are from Mars, systems engineers are from Venus” situation.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-1421
Published: 2014-11-25
mountall 1.54, as used in Ubuntu 14.10, does not properly handle the umask when using the mount utility, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-3605
Published: 2014-11-25
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-6407. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-6407. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-6407 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to pre...

CVE-2014-6093
Published: 2014-11-25
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Portal 7.0.x before 7.0.0.2 CF29, 8.0.x through 8.0.0.1 CF14, and 8.5.x before 8.5.0 CF02 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL.

CVE-2014-6196
Published: 2014-11-25
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Web Experience Factory (WEF) 6.1.5 through 8.5.0.1, as used in WebSphere Dashboard Framework (WDF) and Lotus Widget Factory (LWF), allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by leveraging a Dojo builder error in an unspecified WebSp...

CVE-2014-7247
Published: 2014-11-25
Unspecified vulnerability in JustSystems Ichitaro 2008 through 2011; Ichitaro Government 6, 7, 2008, 2009, and 2010; Ichitaro Pro; Ichitaro Pro 2; Ichitaro 2011 Sou; Ichitaro 2012 Shou; Ichitaro 2013 Gen; and Ichitaro 2014 Tetsu allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?