Attacks/Breaches
10/22/2013
02:07 PM
50%
50%

Google Project Shield Promises DDoS Attack Prevention

Project Shield service is designed to keep static websites for human rights, election and news groups online, but it might presage a commercial Google DDoS defense service.

Google Nexus 7, Chromecast: Visual Tour
Google Nexus 7, Chromecast: Visual Tour
(click image for larger view)
Can Google's new Project Shield save the world from packet storms, zombie PCs, low-orbit ion cannons or Armageddon attacks?

Not yet. But Google's latest endeavor, sounding a bit like a Marvel Comics creation, can provide distributed denial of service (DDoS) protection for static Web pages.

"Project Shield is an initiative to expand Google's own distributed denial of service (DDoS) mitigation capabilities to protect free expression online," says Google's related service page. "The service currently combines Google's DDoS mitigation technologies and Page Speed Service to allow websites to serve their content through Google's own infrastructure for DDoS mitigation."

The effort is currently invitation only, although Google is soliciting "trusted testers" to help it get the service up and running, provided they hail from the domains of "news, human rights or elections-related content."

[ Find out how to gird your DNS against distributed denial of service attacks. Read Is Your DNS Server A Weapon? ]

The DDoS attack defense is offered via Page Speed Service, which according to a related FAQ "is an online service to automatically speed up loading of your web pages." According to Google, the service "fetches content from your servers, rewrites your pages by applying Web performance best practices and serves them to end users via Google's servers across the globe."

This level of global distribution also provides protection against some types of DDoS attacks, although the company cautioned that it's not foolproof. "Google has designed its infrastructure to defend itself from quite large attacks and this initiative is aimed at providing a similar level of protection to third-party websites," it said.

Google said that Page Speed Service and Project Shield are currently free, but if that changes it will give users at least 30 days' notice. If it does begin to charge, Google hopes to offer discounted or free subscriptions for charities and non-profits.

Speaking by phone, Shuman Ghosemajumder, VP of strategy for automated attack defense firm Shape Security and formerly the head of Google's efforts to combat click fraud, lauded the new service. "Project Shield is a great initiative that I think is going to really make a difference for free speech online," he said. "When you're looking at websites that provide that type of information, it's typically static website content, and that's what Project Shield is designed for."

"But if you're a bank, trading website or social network -- anything that requires database-driven, real-time dynamic interaction -- that's not what Project Shield is designed for," Ghosemajumder said, noting that he wasn't involved in the development of Google's DDoS defenses.

In fact, attacks against database-driven websites are much more difficult to defend against, as the Operation Ababil DDoS attacks against U.S. banks proved, before the months-long attack campaign appeared to go on hiatus. That's because attackers can bring a variety of database-choking techniques to bear, ranging from packet-spewing SYN floods and encrypted traffic attacks from botnet-infected zombie PCs to crowd-sourced JavaScript attack tools such as low-orbit ion cannons and potentially even overwhelming Armageddon attacks that take down upstream service providers, too.

Of course, there's nothing to stop Google from one day ramping up its service to the point where it can defend database-driven sites, and compete with current DDoS defense service providers. In fact, Matthew Prince, CEO of DDoS attack mitigation firm CloudFlare, has been predicting that will happen, and that Google might gobble up rivals in the process.

"The challenges that websites face in both performance and security are substantial so it's inevitable there will be a consolidation of the edge of the network," Prince told the Register. "In the future, there will likely be two to six companies that run the edge of the Web. We've been predicting for some time those companies will be Akamai, Amazon, CloudFlare, and Google."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Drew Conry-Murray
50%
50%
Drew Conry-Murray,
User Rank: Ninja
10/23/2013 | 12:36:48 AM
re: Google Project Shield Promises DDoS Attack Prevention
DDoS yes, ion cannons no. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: just wondering...Thanx
Current Issue
Security Operations and IT Operations: Finding the Path to Collaboration
A wide gulf has emerged between SOC and NOC teams that's keeping both of them from assuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of IT systems. Here's how experts think it should be bridged.
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
In past years, security researchers have discovered ways to hack cars, medical devices, automated teller machines, and many other targets. Dark Reading Executive Editor Kelly Jackson Higgins hosts researcher Samy Kamkar and Levi Gundert, vice president of threat intelligence at Recorded Future, to discuss some of 2016's most unusual and creative hacks by white hats, and what these new vulnerabilities might mean for the coming year.