Attacks/Breaches
1/13/2010
05:03 PM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Chinese Spy Agency Behind Google Cyber Attack, Report Claims

The cyber attacks that contributed to Google's reevaluation of its operations in China also hit 33 other companies.

George Kurtz, CTO of McAfee, said in a blog post that his company is participating in the investigation and that the intellectual property stolen from Google was likely source code. Citing a study conducted by his company, he said that businesses lose more than $1 trillion in intellectual property annually due to data theft and cybercrime,

In a blog post on Wednesday, Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer at Finnish security company F-Secure, said he believes "the attack was launched via a convincing e-mail with an exploit-ridden PDF attachment."

The iDefense report says that the December attack on Google and other companies has similarities to a July attack on about 100 companies in the IT sector. That attack used a malicious PDF file to exploit a zero-day vulnerability in Adobe Reader.

"According to sources familiar with the present attack, attackers delivered malicious code used against Google and others using PDFs as e-mail attachments; those same sources also claim that the files have similar characteristics to those distributed during the July attacks," the report states. "In both attacks, the malicious files drop a backdoor Trojan in the form of a Windows DLL."

The report suggests the July and December attacks may be the same attack, meaning that affected companies may have been compromised for months.

In reference to the December attack, an Adobe spokesperson said, "At this time, we have no evidence to suggest that a vulnerability in Adobe Reader was an attack vector in this incident."

Adobe on Tuesday happened to issue a security patch for a vulnerability in its Acrobat and Reader software that had been actively exploited for at least a month.

Alan Paller, director of research at the SANS Institute, said it is likely that the attack was a highly targeted spear-phishing attack that exploited a zero-day vulnerability in the software used by employees at targeted companies.

"It doesn't really matter if the attack targeted Word or Adobe or a video player," said Chris Wysopal, CTO of Veracode. "What's clear is that the set of software on the user's system really isn't being scrutinized and managed the way a machine connected to the Internet, like a Web server or gateway, is."

That's something that needs to change, Wysopal insists.

Previous
2 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-6628
Published: 2015-05-28
Aruba Networks ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) before 6.5.0 allows remote administrators to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-1389
Published: 2015-05-28
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Aruba Networks ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) before 6.4.5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the username parameter to tips/tipsLoginSubmit.action.

CVE-2015-1392
Published: 2015-05-28
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Aruba Networks ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) before 6.4.5 allow remote administrators to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-1550
Published: 2015-05-28
Directory traversal vulnerability in Aruba Networks ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) before 6.4.5 allows remote administrators to execute arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-1551
Published: 2015-05-28
Directory traversal vulnerability in Aruba Networks ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) before 6.4.4 allows remote administrators to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
After a serious cybersecurity incident, everyone will be looking to you for answers -- but you’ll never have complete information and you’ll never have enough time. So in those heated moments, when a business is on the brink of collapse, how will you and the rest of the board room executives respond?