Attacks/Breaches
2/18/2011
12:10 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Botnet Victims Increased 654% In 2011

The top 10 botnets are responsible for 57% of all infections, says Damballa report.

Top 10 Security Stories Of 2010
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: Top 10 Security Stories Of 2010

The botnet market is both growing and consolidating. The top 10 botnets of 2010 -- based on total number of PCs compromised -- began the year with 22% market share, but grew to account for 57% of all botnet infections by the end of the year. Meanwhile, in the same timeframe, the number of unique botnet victims grew by 654%.

Those findings come from a report, released on Tuesday, by anti-botnet security company Damballa. The report finds a botnet landscape that is changing rapidly, driven in part by the ready availability of inexpensive botnet-building toolkits.

Which botnets rule? The biggest botnets in 2010 (based on their percentage of victims) were the TDLBotnetA botnet run by RudeWarlockMob (15% market share), the RogueAVBotnet run by FreakySpiderCartel (6%), the ZeusBotnetB run by FourLakeRiders (5%), followed by Monkif (5%), Koobface.A (4%), and Conficker.C (3%). That list includes one-off botnets created and customized by criminal gangs, many of whom use DIY tools such as Zeus as the base.

Interestingly, 60% of botnets seen in 2010 didn't even exist in 2009. In fact, "only one botnet -- Monkif -- made it to the top 10 of both years," said Gunter Ollmann, VP of research for Damballa, in a blog post.

In general, what sets apart the botnet winners from losers is that the biggest ones get updated frequently with revised fraud targets. They also embrace the latest botnet features and functionality. That includes updating the malware on infected PCs, running multiple infection campaigns at once, generating one-of-a-kind malware for each victim, and using multiple infection vectors.

Today's top botnet are also succeeding thanks to a thriving ecosystem of best-of-breed, complementary services. "The federated ecosystem of botnet building means that malware authoring, drive-by-download infections, content delivery, and [command-and-control] hosting are increasingly distributed amongst multiple unaffiliated service providers," said Ollmann. "The increased accessibility to specialist service providers has made it easier for botnet operators to rapidly grow their botnets and monetize their ill-gotten gains."

Interestingly, this distributed approach to botnets means that a PC today can be infected with malware that places it under the control of multiple pieces of botnet-driven malware. According to Ollmann, "over 35% of botnet victims were simultaneously members of multiple botnets in 2010."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Flash Poll
Current Issue
Cartoon
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2012-6651
Published: 2014-07-31
Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in the Vitamin plugin before 1.1.0 for WordPress allow remote attackers to access arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the path parameter to (1) add_headers.php or (2) minify.php.

CVE-2014-2970
Published: 2014-07-31
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-5139. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-5139, and has also been used to refer to an unrelated topic that is currently outside the scope of CVE. This unrelated topic is a LibreSSL code change adding functionality ...

CVE-2014-3488
Published: 2014-07-31
The SslHandler in Netty before 3.9.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via a crafted SSLv2Hello message.

CVE-2014-3554
Published: 2014-07-31
Buffer overflow in the ndp_msg_opt_dnssl_domain function in libndp allows remote routers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted DNS Search List (DNSSL) in an IPv6 router advertisement.

CVE-2014-5171
Published: 2014-07-31
SAP HANA Extend Application Services (XS) does not encrypt transmissions for applications that enable form based authentication using SSL, which allows remote attackers to obtain credentials and other sensitive information by sniffing the network.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio