Application Security
1/3/2014
11:56 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Snapchat Breach: What's Next

App vendor planning new version that lets users opt out of appearing in beleaguered 'Find Friends' feature.

Snapchat, a mobile photo-messaging app created for wiping out traces of the messages for privacy reasons, this week was hit with a major breach of its users' privacy that exposed names and phone numbers of some 4.6 million of its customers. The data dump came after security researchers published a proof-of-concept for a weakness associated with the "Find Friends" feature.

The app provider late Thursday announced that it would update Snapchat to better protect its users. "We will be releasing an updated version of the Snapchat application that will allow Snapchatters to opt out of appearing in Find Friends after they have verified their phone number. We’re also improving rate limiting and other restrictions to address future attempts to abuse our service," Snapchat said in a blog post.

Snapchat also said researchers could email the firm at security@snapchat.com for any vulnerability discoveries. "We want to make sure that security experts can get a hold of us when they discover new ways to abuse our service so that we can respond quickly to address those concerns. The best way to let us know about security vulnerabilities is by emailing us: security@snapchat.com," Snapchat said.

The blog post came in response to criticism by the researchers who first reported and then published details on the flaw in Snapchat's app after saying they had not gotten a response from Snapchat. A hacker group on Wednesday exploited the flaw and posted online to a site called SnapchatDB the names and phone numbers, with the final two digits obscured, on some 2.6 million Snapchat users.

Read the rest of this article on Dark Reading.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
chrisp114
50%
50%
chrisp114,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/4/2014 | 4:50:59 PM
Worry more about Google and Facebook hacks
I'm sure they'll fix the problem, but what about when Google or Facebook gets hacked? Just think about all of the personal information they collect about you. This isn't limited to information you give them. They track your browsing history and have information about every website you visit. When that information gets hacked and distributed to your friends, family, and colleagues, then you will be ruined. This is why I'm a strong advocate for using privacy-based sites such as DuckDuckGo, Ravetree, HushMail, SnapChat, etc.
PaulS681
50%
50%
PaulS681,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/5/2014 | 6:23:14 PM
Re: Worry more about Google and Facebook hacks
Good point Chris. I would say Facebook is hacking its own users. They give you a choice to opt out of collecting certain data and they collect it any way no matter what you choose. Then they come out with a "ohh, we are sorry" bs.
danielcawrey
50%
50%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/6/2014 | 2:32:59 PM
Re: Worry more about Google and Facebook hacks
I think SnapChat has a ton of potential.

That being said, they've got to minimize these PR problems. Set up a bug bounty program like Google does. Enough said. 
Kristin Burnham
50%
50%
Kristin Burnham,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/7/2014 | 3:30:43 PM
Re: Worry more about Google and Facebook hacks
@DanielCawrey -- what about Snapchat appeals to you? I've used it -- and was amused  -- but it seems like an app that's bigger among teens.
asksqn
50%
50%
asksqn,
User Rank: Ninja
1/4/2014 | 6:33:39 PM
Saddle up and ride smart
This latest high profile hack just underscores the inherent insecurity of 99% of the mobile apps currently available. In the mobile app world, the consumer is forced to agree to a my-way-or-the-highway TOS -either you agree to give the app carte blanche to your device, or it simply will not install.  Google Android latest version had a chance to redeem itself and allow the user to control which apps phoned home (which has been a feature of iPhones for some time now) but Google, inexplicably, instead, chose to yoink away control of the user's device from the user in a follow up update to the OS. Then gave some happy sounding but ultra lame PR newsbyte about how this feature was a bad idea.  Bottom line:  when it comes to mobile apps and security breaches, it's the wild, wild west out there, people. 
PaulS681
50%
50%
PaulS681,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/5/2014 | 6:19:53 PM
Snapchat
 Unfortunately breaches are becoming so common it just isn't surprising anymore. Kind of like football players getting caught for steroid use.

I see that snapchat didn't act on the researchers findings but is that cause for the researchers to publish the flaw so hackers will do it? I guess that is one way to get them to fix it.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
DevOps’ Impact on Application Security
DevOps’ Impact on Application Security
Managing the interdependency between software and infrastructure is a thorny challenge. Often, it’s a “developers are from Mars, systems engineers are from Venus” situation.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-6477
Published: 2014-11-23
Unspecified vulnerability in the JPublisher component in Oracle Database Server 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-4290, CVE-2014-4291, CVE-2014-4292, CVE-2014-4...

CVE-2014-4807
Published: 2014-11-22
Sterling Order Management in IBM Sterling Selling and Fulfillment Suite 9.3.0 before FP8 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a '\0' character.

CVE-2014-6183
Published: 2014-11-22
IBM Security Network Protection 5.1 before 5.1.0.0 FP13, 5.1.1 before 5.1.1.0 FP8, 5.1.2 before 5.1.2.0 FP9, 5.1.2.1 before FP5, 5.2 before 5.2.0.0 FP5, and 5.3 before 5.3.0.0 FP1 on XGS devices allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-8626
Published: 2014-11-22
Stack-based buffer overflow in the date_from_ISO8601 function in ext/xmlrpc/libxmlrpc/xmlrpc.c in PHP before 5.2.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code by including a timezone field in a date, leading to improper XML-RPC encoding...

CVE-2014-8710
Published: 2014-11-22
The decompress_sigcomp_message function in epan/sigcomp-udvm.c in the SigComp UDVM dissector in Wireshark 1.10.x before 1.10.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read and application crash) via a crafted packet.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?