Analytics

10/29/2015
04:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Security Analytics Still Greenfield Opportunity

Surveys out this week show improvement in the use of analytics and threat intelligence but room for better execution.

Stats from two new reports this week show that enterprises are getting better at analyzing security data across their organizations. But there’s room for improvement in how they use analytics to anticipate and respond to security incidents. In particular, cybersecurity teams struggle to marry up their expectations with their execution and deployment of the technology.

Today, SANS Institute leaked out details from a new survey it expects to release in full next month. Among the high points is the fact that organizations are slowly getting better at leveraging security analytics and threat intelligence.

Approximately two-thirds of organizations say they’ve gotten their mean time to detect security events down to a week or under, compared with just half of organizations last year. Plus, the ratio of organizations who can’t identify how to measure normal behavior has shrunk from about one-third down to a quarter of organizations.

Overall, about 83 percent of organizations report improving visibility into events and breaches.

“Detection and response times are improving, and many teams feel like they are building more effective security event management and intelligence programs with analytics capabilities," says Dave Shackleford, SANS analyst and author of the upcoming report.

Nevertheless, the true inflection point for security analytics is still a long way off given some additional data points provided in a Ponemon Institute survey released yesterday. The study, sponsored by Prelert, showed that even though two-thirds of security specialists believe automated security analytics is crucial for network defense, only a third of them have actually deployed analytics technology to support that.

Additionally, less than 10 percent of organizations report that they are effective in detecting or prioritizing advanced threats. Of those companies that have deployed analytics technology, about half take days or longer to communicate that information to incident response teams.

What’s more, 60 percent say that five or more security breaches were not stopped in the past two years due to insufficient or outdated threat intelligence.

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
New Mexico Man Sentenced on DDoS, Gun Charges
Dark Reading Staff 5/18/2018
Is Threat Intelligence Garbage?
Chris McDaniels, Chief Information Security Officer of Mosaic451,  5/23/2018
More Than Half of Users Reuse Passwords
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  5/24/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Shhh!  They're watching... And you have a laptop?  
Current Issue
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] Navigating the Threat Intelligence Maze
[Strategic Security Report] Navigating the Threat Intelligence Maze
Most enterprises are using threat intel services, but many are still figuring out how to use the data they're collecting. In this Dark Reading survey we give you a look at what they're doing today - and where they hope to go.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-11440
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-25
Liblouis 3.5.0 has a stack-based Buffer Overflow in the function parseChars in compileTranslationTable.c.
CVE-2013-3018
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
The AXIS webapp in deploy-tomcat/axis in IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager (TADDM) 7.1.2 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.1.4 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive configuration information via a direct request, as demonstrated by happyaxis.jsp. IBM X-Force ID: 84354.
CVE-2013-3023
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager (TADDM) 7.1.2 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.1.4 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about Tomcat credentials by sniffing the network for a session in which HTTP is used. IBM X-Force ID: 84361.
CVE-2013-3024
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5 through 8.5.0.2 on UNIX allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging improper process initialization. IBM X-Force ID: 84362.
CVE-2018-5674
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader before 9.1 and PhantomPDF before 9.1. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw...