Analytics

9/22/2015
06:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Healthcare Biggest Offender In 10 Years Of Data Breaches

Missing devices and untrustworthy insiders made the healthcare industry responsible for more (reported) data breaches than any other sector all decade.

Over the past 10 years of data breach history, 41 percent of breaches were caused not by hacking, but by device loss. Because of a particularly bad record of holding track of its devices, the healthcare industry has been responsible for more breaches than any other sector this decade, according to Trend Micro's analysis of the past 10 years of data breaches -- as catalogued by the nonprofit Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.

More than one-quarter (26.9%) of the data breaches reported since 2005 were in healthcare, but as Trend Micro points out in its report, these are only the breaches we know about. A vast majority of data breaches remain unreported, because data breach notification laws do not apply to them. There may be intellectual property leaks that would give you nightmares, but you won't receive a letter about it unless your PII was involved, and even then not all the details will be shared publicly.

[By 2020 there will be 25 billion Internet of Things devices...all full of vulnerabilities. What can we do to solve the problem now? Don't miss the next episode of Dark Reading Radio, "Fixing IoT Security," this Wednesday, Sep. 23 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time.]

According to the report, from January 2005 to April 2015:

  • 41% of breaches were caused by lost devices.
  • 25% of breaches hacking and malware
  • 17.4% of breaches were caused unintentional disclosure (not including lost devices)
  • 12% of breaches were insider leaks.

However, some data was hardly ever compromised through the loss of devices. According to the report, a lost device rarely results in a compromise of credentials or payment card data, but nearly always in a compromise of PII.

These numbers also varied by industry, and in relation to the kind of data stolen and how it was used.

Healthcare and ID theft

Healthcare was hit hardest, accounting for 26.9 percent of breaches this decade, followed by education (16.8%), government (15.9%), and retail (12.5%).

Healthcare attributed 60% of its data breaches to lost devices and only 7% to hacking.

Yet, healthcare also had a larger insider leak problem than any other sector (17.5% of its breaches). Insider leaks were the primary source of identity theft cases (44.2%) and healthcare was hit harder by identity theft than any other sector, accounting for 29.8% of cases.

According to the report, insiders rarely steal credentials, but rather personally identifiable information, health information, financial data, and payment card data for the purposes of selling it, committing identity theft/fraud, or filing fraudulent tax claims.

"Stealing health data became popular from 2010 onward. It contains PII and may also include financial data, making it a lucrative target for criminals. There is a 72.74% chance that PII was also stolen if health data was stolen. There is a 20.79% chance that financial data was also stolen if health information was stolen," the report says.

Retail and payment cards

Retail was hit hardest by payment card breaches, accounting for almost half (47.8%) of them. Some of the traditional ways to lift credit card data required physical access to payment cards, but most now happen with the help of malware and hacking, particularly the point-of-sale malware that became popular in 2014. Even when averaged over the 10-year period, 54.8% of credit card data theft was committed via malware and hacking. 

The value of data

PII is still the likeliest data to be stolen, but its value on the black market is dropping -- down from $4 per line last year, to just $1. Some of the other things popular on the market now include Uber accounts, Amazon, Netflix, Facebook, and Fed Ex accounts, as well as:

  • mobile phone accounts: $14
  • PayPal/eBay accounts: $300
  • Full credit reports for people with high FICO scores: $25
  • Banking credentials: $200 - $500, depending on available balance of account 

Criminals value the data very differently from the individuals whose data it is. Trend Micro surveyed 1,000 customers about how much their data was worth. They valued passwords most, but only at $75.80. Health information and medical records were next, at $59.80. (American customers valued it more highly than European and Japanese customers, at $82.90.) Payment details were worth $36.60, purchase history $20.60, and physical location data only $16.10.

"One conclusion that we can draw from the survey is that US respondents valued nearly all of their personal information more than their counterparts from other countries," the report said. "While the perceived value of stolen data differs from its actual selling price, the final dollar value of damage inflicted to a business, an organization, or an individual by the criminal exploitation is significantly higher than both the perceived value and selling price."

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
9/23/2015 | 9:47:00 AM
Insider Leakage
Working in the healthcare environment for a few years its easy to see why this is true. Insider leakage whether malicious or unintended is largely due to the environment of healthcare. The number 1 reason healthcare exists, from an altruistic standpoint, is to help people. This needs to be the main goal. But unfortunately a byproduct of that seems to be that doctors have been highly exalted to the point where they don't have to follow the rules outlined by security. This isn't the only issue but in terms of leakage its a large component. I've known doctors to have their assistants handle all their computer credentials and enter information that was outside of their role, bring case files from one institution to another, etc.

Everyone needs to have an equal seat at the table.
Crowdsourced vs. Traditional Pen Testing
Alex Haynes, Chief Information Security Officer, CDL,  3/19/2019
BEC Scammer Pleads Guilty
Dark Reading Staff 3/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
Organizations are responding to new threats with new processes for detecting and mitigating them. Here's a look at how the discipline of incident response is evolving.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-15583
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-25
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in point_list.php in GNUBOARD5 before 5.3.1.6 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the popup title parameter.
CVE-2017-7340
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-25
A Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Fortinet FortiPortal versions 4.0.0 and below allows an attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the applicationSearch parameter in the FortiView functionality.
CVE-2014-9187
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-25
Multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in Honeywell Experion PKS all versions prior to R400.6, all versions prior to R410.6, and all versions prior to R430.2 modules, which could lead to possible remote code execution or denial of service. Honeywell strongly encourages and recomme...
CVE-2014-9189
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-25
Multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities were found in Honeywell Experion PKS all versions prior to R400.6, all versions prior to R410.6, and all versions prior to R430.2 modules that could lead to possible remote code execution, dynamic memory corruption, or denial of service. Honeywell...
CVE-2019-10044
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-25
Telegram Desktop before 1.5.12 on Windows, and the Telegram applications for Android, iOS, and Linux, is vulnerable to an IDN homograph attack when displaying messages containing URLs. This occurs because the application produces a clickable link even if (for example) Latin and Cyrillic characters e...