Analytics

2/23/2015
05:30 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

DOJ R&D Agency Awards Grants For Speedier Digital Forensics

The US Department of Justice's National Institute of Justice is funding new incident response technology to assist law enforcement.

The US Department of Justice's R&D agency has awarded grants for the development of new tools that speed up the process of examining hard drives in the wake of a cyberattack or other types of criminal cases.

A one-terabyte hard drive can take law enforcement more than 16 hours to image, according to the DOJ's National Institute of Justice (NIJ), but new technology developed by grant awardee Grier Forensics speeds up that process to about three hours. The NIJ also awarded a grant to the Rand Corp. for a cloud-based storage solution for the imaged and archived evidence pulled from the drives. Disks are imaged to ensure that the evidence isn't modified during analysis.

Martin Novak, a computer scientist at the DOJ's NIJ, says the goal is to expedite the process of cyberattack and other digital forensics investigations. "There's so much evidence to be examined, and some of the cases are rather complicated," Novak says. "That's where state and local government run into a backlog," he says, unlike the FBI and US Secret Service, which typically have more resources to handle such investigations.

"It takes 16 and a half hours to image a one terabyte drive … so do the math with five [drives]. We are looking to reduce the amount of time" it takes to gather that evidence, he says.

Ultimately, it also may change the way law enforcement gathers evidence from drives. "Up until now, it was get and image everything. But … you don't really need everything [on the drive]," just the user data, he says. Grier's so-called "sifting collectors" technique identifies and copies the relevant sectors of the drive with that data, he says.

"This is not only going to save time, but it may save on the back-end what you need to store on a given case," Novak says.

Temp files, history logs, and browser artifacts, as well as registry and system metadata, all are considered relevant sectors of the drive in an investigation, according to Grier Forensics.

Jonathan Grier, principal of Grier Forensics, says his firm initially received funding from DARPA under its Cyber Fast Track program that led to the initial development of a "sifting collectors" prototype. Grier says the technology now is in the field testing stage under the NIJ contract, and is based on Linux and Mac OS, and soon will support Windows as well, he says.

"The goal of this is to incorporate it into a few other things" including forensic duplicator tools and forensics products along the lines of enCase and AccessData's, he says. The final product will be finished by June of 2016, he says.

[The so-called Equation Group epitomizes the goal of persistence in cyber spying--reprogramming hard drives and hacking other targets such as air-gapped computers--and points to possible US connection. Read Newly Discovered 'Master' Cyber Espionage Group Trumps Stuxnet.]

In an enterprise's incident response investigation, though, the speed of imaging a disk isn't always a factor, notes Ryan Kazanciyan, technical director of FireEye's Mandiant group.

"From a law enforcement perspective, if they are working on a smaller-scale [case], imaging [speed] is important," Kazanciyan says. But for most cases that Mandiant investigates at enterprises, the priority is to be able to conduct large-scale analysis of live systems, so speed of imaging isn't as crucial, he says.

"The key is leads and indicators [of compromise], regardless of where the system is, and to be able to search from it across the endpoints" as well, he says.

Mandiant typically images specific disks once the incident response investigation requires a "deep dive" into certain ones, he says. "An average investigation has 50,000 systems … we do a deep-dive of 100 of them, and five or 10 of them need a full image," he says. "In incident response, organizations are struggling because they don't have broad visibility to search and analyze" the attack, he says.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
New Mexico Man Sentenced on DDoS, Gun Charges
Dark Reading Staff 5/18/2018
Is Threat Intelligence Garbage?
Chris McDaniels, Chief Information Security Officer of Mosaic451,  5/23/2018
More Than Half of Users Reuse Passwords
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  5/24/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Shhh!  They're watching... And you have a laptop?  
Current Issue
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] Navigating the Threat Intelligence Maze
[Strategic Security Report] Navigating the Threat Intelligence Maze
Most enterprises are using threat intel services, but many are still figuring out how to use the data they're collecting. In this Dark Reading survey we give you a look at what they're doing today - and where they hope to go.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-11440
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-25
Liblouis 3.5.0 has a stack-based Buffer Overflow in the function parseChars in compileTranslationTable.c.
CVE-2013-3018
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
The AXIS webapp in deploy-tomcat/axis in IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager (TADDM) 7.1.2 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.1.4 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive configuration information via a direct request, as demonstrated by happyaxis.jsp. IBM X-Force ID: 84354.
CVE-2013-3023
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager (TADDM) 7.1.2 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.1.4 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about Tomcat credentials by sniffing the network for a session in which HTTP is used. IBM X-Force ID: 84361.
CVE-2013-3024
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5 through 8.5.0.2 on UNIX allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging improper process initialization. IBM X-Force ID: 84362.
CVE-2018-5674
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader before 9.1 and PhantomPDF before 9.1. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw...