This isn't the first time a Japanese defense contractor has been hit by APT attackers -- it's just the first time such an attack has gone public, security experts say. News of the attack was first reported in the Japanese press and was then picked up by Reuters today.
According to a translated statement by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which builds submarines, missiles, and nuclear power components, the company first detected the intrusion in mid-August.
"We've found out that some system information such as IP addresses have been leaked and that's creepy enough," a spokesman for Mitsubishi Heavy is quoted as saying in a Reuters report. "We can't rule out small possibilities of further information leakage but so far crucial data about our products or technologies have been kept safe."
Some 80 machines were infected with malware at the firm's Tokyo headquarters and manufacturing and research and development facilities: Kobe Shipyard & Machinery Works, Nagasaki Shipyard & Machinery Works and Nagoya Guidance & Propulsion System Works were among the sites reported to have been infiltrated by attackers. Around eight different types of malware were detected on the various machines, the reports said.
Richard Bejtlich, chief security officer and vice president at Mandiant, says the Japanese have been working on an initiative to defend against APT-type attacks. "There's no doubt that Japan is worried about Chinese espionage … I understand that there's an initiative starting next year to help their industry resist those attacks," Bejtlich says.
While the attack on a high-profile industrial power in Japan isn't really a surprise, it confirms theories that these types of attacks are a global problem. "It's validation that this isn't simply a U.S. problem," Bejtlich says. "Hopefully, people [worldwide] will realize this isn't a manufactured threat, but it's a real problem and fairly widespread."
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, meanwhile, said in a statement that network addresses might have been leaked and that it's still investigating the attack and the extent of the data exposure.
"I don't suppose we need another wake-up call, but this news leaves a disconcerting after-taste," says Will Irace, director of research for Fidelis. "There are some good technologies available to help advanced persistent defenders safeguard their enterprises. But it still feels like we're fighting blind because targeted companies are reluctant to come forward with details on how they were victimized."
Irace says he'd like victims to cooperate more closely to share information. "The deck is stacked against them: Strategy is going to be at least as important as technology if they're going to catch up," Irace says.
Mandiant's Bejtlich says while the Mitsubishi attack isn't likely to help spur more cooperation among victim organizations around the world, it could encourage some diplomatic cooperation. "At the diplomatic level, it makes a difference," he says. "It continues to point to the Chinese as doing something that is not considered to be responsible."
There's really no technical way to resolve the cyberespionage problem, he says, but it could be addressed at the national and diplomatic levels.
Meanwhile, details were scarce about how the attackers got in and how far they got. Adam Powers, chief technology officer for Lancope, says it appears Mitsubishi Heavy Industries relied too heavily on its perimeter security. "Many organizations place the bulk of their cyberdefense technology at the perimeter of the network. Unfortunately, once the attackers breach the perimeter defenses, it's easy to compromise additional unprotected resources behind the outer wall. Once the attackers have a persistent foothold within the network, detection and remediation can become very difficult," Powers says. "Given the scope of the attack on Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, it may be months before all of the breached resources are discovered."
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries had $3.4 billion in contracts with Japan's Ministry of Defence for the year as of March – one-fourth of the agency's spending for the year, according to Reuters. The company makes surface-to-air Patriot missiles and AIM-7 Sparrow air-to-air missiles, and manufactures wings for Boeing's 787 Dreamliner jet.
Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. |
How Did They Get In? A Guide to Tracking Down The Source of an APT
If you think that your organization hasn't been affected by an advanced persistent threat, you probably haven't looked hard enough. Identifying that your organization is under attack is difficult enough; determining the scope of infiltration and damage presents a whole new level of challenge. To effectively protect against APTs, security pros will need to employ an arsenal of tools in a coordinated fashion, as well as develop new understandings of and approaches to system and data exploits. Here's a short and simple guide to this challenge.
Detecting and Defending Against Advanced Persistent Threats
APTs are a growing problem for enterprises big and small. Protecting your organization from these targeted threats
requires constant vigilance, ongoing employee training and a concerted effort to align security systems to address
every phase of an APT. Companies also need to develop a remediation and response plan if, despite best efforts, defenses are breached.
Smarter, Stealthier, Sneakier Malware
Increasingly sophisticated and targeted attacks are making it more difficult for organizations to detect
and defend against the latest malware. In this compendium of recent coverage from Dark Reading, you?ll get a look at some of the newest -- and most dangerous -- malware on the Web, and what you can do to stop it.
Other reports from the Advanced Threats Tech Center:
| Sponsored by: |
MOBILE SECURITY - Mapping an Ecosystem of Risk
This white paper highlights the various considerations for defending mobile applications-from the mobile application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies needed to properly assess mobile applications risk.
Software Security Delivered in the Cloud
This Solution Guide details the automated, turnkey service that requires no special security assessment expertise. It details HP's market-leading static and dynamic analysis technologies that help organizations worldwide gain insight into the security state of their essential business applications.
SANS Mobility/BYOD Security Survey
This survey, which includes input from more than 500 IT professionals, explores how organizations are managing risk around their end user mobile devices as well as what level of policies and controls enterprises have around mobile usage.
Expert Guide to Application Security - Real-time Hybrid Analysis
Explore the next generation of hybrid security analysis - what it is, how it works, and its benefits. This white paper details how hybrid application security enables organizations to resolve critical software security issues faster and at a lower cost than any other available technology.
A Mainstay Partners Study: Does Application Security Pay?
Measuring the Business Impact of Software Security Assurance Solutions: a study of 17 organizations that implemented solutions from Fortify Software, combining industry research and benchmark analysis to identify, qualify, and quantify the full range of benefits seen from their SSA investments.
MORE NEWSFEED >>>