Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

Siemens To Patch Major SCADA Authentication Holes Next Month

Researcher discloses serious security flaws in Siemens products

Dec 22, 2011 | 03:05 PM | 

By Kelly Jackson Higgins
Dark Reading
In the wake of a researcher's public disclosure of flaws in Siemens products that could let an attacker take over a control system without even knowing the username and password, Siemens today said it will issue security updates in January to fix product vulnerabilities.

Security researcher Billy Rios on Tuesday posted details in his blog of some of the vulnerabilities he and fellow researcher Terry McCorkle had found and reported to the ICS-CERT and Siemens in May. Siemens confirmed it was in the process of fixing the flaws today after Rios cried foul when the company appeared to deny the existence of the vulnerabilities that he and fellow researcher Terry McCorke had been working with the company on fixing.

Rios, who says he and McCorkle have reported some 1,000 bugs in industrial control system products during the past few years, decided to go public after a Siemens PR representative told a Reuters reporter following up on Rios' work that the company had no outstanding bug reports. "I had to go public," Rios says. "I just had the PR face of a major company telling a major media outlet that I'm a BS artist."

Rios says he reported to ICS-CERT in May an authentication bypass vulnerability in Siemens Simatic systems, which manage industrial control systems, as well as several other security issues. He went public this week with the authentication bypass bug as well as two other issues: that Simatic's default password is "100," and that if a user tries to change that password using a special character (question mark, hash mark, etc.), the password automatically reverts back to "100" without the user's knowledge.

That default password was likely used by the hacker "prof," who accessed the water utility system in South Houston, Rios says. "We had reported that bug in May, and we sat on our hands and waited" for Siemens to fix it, Rios says.

Meanwhile, a Siemens spokesperson says it was all a misunderstanding: The firm had no intention of denying vulnerabilities it was working on.

Siemens today issued this statement on its website: "Siemens was notified by IT experts (Billy Rios and Terry McCorke) about vulnerabilities in some of its automation products. These are the WinCC flexible RT versions from 2004 to 2008 SP2 and WinCC Runtime Advanced V11 and multiple Simatic panels (TP, OP, MP, Comfort). We are aware of the reported vulnerabilities, first reported in May 2011. Our development had immediately taken action and addressed these issues. The vulnerabilities will be fixed by security updates, first is planned to be issued in January 2012. In December 2011 further vulnerabilities have been reported which are currently under investigation. We thank Billy Rios and Terry McCorke for reporting the vulnerabilities."

But Rios says he's still not convinced there wasn't some sort of attempt by the SCADA firm to brush under the rug its latest vulnerability woes when Siemens was contacted by the Reuters reporter. "I would have had no problem if they had said, 'We have no comment,'" Rios says. "The spirit of [the response] was deceiving."

[Researchers have been finding gaping security holes in Siemens' process control products during the past few months. See Siemens Shows Up For Black Hat Demo Of SCADA Hack.]

The most serious of the three security issues Rios revealed publicly is the authentication bypass flaw, which he shows in detail here. "Even if you set a really strong password that's not guessable, I'm able to guess access to your system anyway," he says.

When the administrator logs into the Web HMI, the application returns a session cookie that can be easily decoded to provide remote access to the Siemens Simatic HMI, according to Rios.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS



Advanced Threats Reports

report How Did They Get In? A Guide to Tracking Down The Source of an APT
If you think that your organization hasn't been affected by an advanced persistent threat, you probably haven't looked hard enough. Identifying that your organization is under attack is difficult enough; determining the scope of infiltration and damage presents a whole new level of challenge. To effectively protect against APTs, security pros will need to employ an arsenal of tools in a coordinated fashion, as well as develop new understandings of and approaches to system and data exploits. Here's a short and simple guide to this challenge.

report Detecting and Defending Against Advanced Persistent Threats
APTs are a growing problem for enterprises big and small. Protecting your organization from these targeted threats requires constant vigilance, ongoing employee training and a concerted effort to align security systems to address every phase of an APT. Companies also need to develop a remediation and response plan if, despite best efforts, defenses are breached.

report Smarter, Stealthier, Sneakier Malware
Increasingly sophisticated and targeted attacks are making it more difficult for organizations to detect and defend against the latest malware. In this compendium of recent coverage from Dark Reading, you?ll get a look at some of the newest -- and most dangerous -- malware on the Web, and what you can do to stop it.

Other reports from the Advanced Threats Tech Center:

Related Content

MOBILE SECURITY - Mapping an Ecosystem of Risk
This white paper highlights the various considerations for defending mobile applications-from the mobile application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies needed to properly assess mobile applications risk.

Software Security Delivered in the Cloud
This Solution Guide details the automated, turnkey service that requires no special security assessment expertise. It details HP's market-leading static and dynamic analysis technologies that help organizations worldwide gain insight into the security state of their essential business applications.

SANS Mobility/BYOD Security Survey
This survey, which includes input from more than 500 IT professionals, explores how organizations are managing risk around their end user mobile devices as well as what level of policies and controls enterprises have around mobile usage.

Expert Guide to Application Security - Real-time Hybrid Analysis
Explore the next generation of hybrid security analysis - what it is, how it works, and its benefits. This white paper details how hybrid application security enables organizations to resolve critical software security issues faster and at a lower cost than any other available technology.

A Mainstay Partners Study: Does Application Security Pay?
Measuring the Business Impact of Software Security Assurance Solutions: a study of 17 organizations that implemented solutions from Fortify Software, combining industry research and benchmark analysis to identify, qualify, and quantify the full range of benefits seen from their SSA investments.




Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports